Gender and quality signals: How does gender influence the effectiveness of signals in crowdfunding?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-40
Author(s):  
Yin-Chi Liao
Keyword(s):  
Gender Influence ◽  
Quality Signals

2019-P: Gender Influence on Body Habitus for an Underserved Population with Type 2 Diabetes and Food Insecurity

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2019-P
Author(s):  
WENDY C. BEVIER ◽  
NAMINO M. GLANTZ ◽  
ARIANNA J. LAREZ ◽  
MARY A. KUJAN ◽  
CASEY CONNEELY ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Food Insecurity ◽  
Underserved Population ◽  
Body Habitus ◽  
Gender Influence

scholarly journals PS6:127 Gender influence in systemic lupus erythematosus

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kechida ◽  
R Mesfar ◽  
R Klii ◽  
S Hammami ◽  
I Khochtali
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Gender Influence

scholarly journals Low‐quality birds do not display high‐quality signals: The cysteine‐pheomelanin mechanism of honesty

Evolution ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismael Galván ◽  
Kazumasa Wakamatsu ◽  
Pablo R. Camarero ◽  
Rafael Mateo ◽  
Carlos Alonso‐Alvarez
Keyword(s):  
High Quality ◽  
Quality Signals

Does gender influence response to differing psychotherapies by those with unipolar depression?

2011 ◽  
Vol 130 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Parker ◽  
Bianca Blanch ◽  
Joanna Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Unipolar Depression ◽  
Gender Influence

Gender Influence on Perceptions of Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment

1995 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol L. Baird ◽  
Nora L. Bensko ◽  
Paul A. Bell ◽  
Wayne Viney ◽  
William Douglas Woody
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Harassment ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Hostile Environment ◽  
Point Scale ◽  
Reasonable Person ◽  
Gender Influence ◽  
Female Perpetrators ◽  
Strongly Agree ◽  
Reasonable Woman Standard

Perceptions of sexual harassment were investigated as a function of perpetrators' and recipients' gender. Undergraduate students (100 women, 98 men) were presented 34 scenarios of men and women interacting at work. Participants were asked to read carefully each scenario and indicate on a scale anchored by 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree) their opinions as to whether the scenario represented an incident of sexual harassment. Analysis indicated that women rated “hostile environment” scenarios as more harassing than men, and male perpetrators were rated as more harassing than female perpetrators. Even though some scenarios were rated as more harassing than others, the full range of the 7-point scale was used on every scenario, indicating a lack of agreement on what constitutes harassment. This lack of agreement highlights the debate within the legal community about whether the “reasonable person” or the “reasonable woman” standard should be used to judge sexual harassment in the workplace.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document