Graduating internal medicine residents’ self-assessment and performance of advanced cardiac life support skills

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane B. Wayne ◽  
John Butter ◽  
Viva J. Siddall ◽  
Monica J. Fudala ◽  
Leonard D. Wade ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (Suppl) ◽  
pp. S9-S12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane B. Wayne ◽  
Viva J. Siddall ◽  
John Butter ◽  
Monica J. Fudala ◽  
Leonard D. Wade ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane B. Wayne ◽  
John Butter ◽  
Viva J. Siddall ◽  
Monica J. Fudala ◽  
Lee A. Linquist ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny E. Han ◽  
Antoine R. Trammell ◽  
James D. Finklea ◽  
Timothy N. Udoji ◽  
Daniel D. Dressler ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Simulation training is widely accepted as an effective teaching tool, especially for dealing with high-risk situations. Objective We assessed whether standardized, simulation-based advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training improved performance in managing simulated and actual cardiac arrests. Methods A total of 103 second- and third-year internal medicine residents were randomized to 2 groups. The first group underwent conventional ACLS training. The second group underwent two 2 1/2-hour sessions of standardized simulation ACLS teaching. The groups were assessed by evaluators blinded to their assignment during in-hospital monthly mock codes and actual inpatient code sheets at 3 large academic hospitals. Primary outcomes were time to initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, time to administration of first epinephrine/vasopressin, time to delivery of first defibrillation, and adherence to American Heart Association guidelines. Results There were no differences in primary outcomes among the study arms and hospital sites. During 21 mock codes, the most common error was misidentification of the initial rhythm (67% [6 of 9] and 58% [7 of 12] control and simulation arms, respectively, P  =  .70). There were no differences in primary outcome among groups in 147 actual inpatient codes. Conclusions This blinded, randomized study found no effect on primary outcomes. A notable finding was the percentage of internal medicine residents who misidentified cardiac arrest rhythms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 678-678
Author(s):  
Amina Pervaiz ◽  
Shefali Godara ◽  
Neelambuj Regmi ◽  
Kunwardeep Dhillon ◽  
Asil Daud ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Zoheb Azhar ◽  
Monil Majmundar ◽  
Shmuel Golfeyz ◽  
Tikal Kansara ◽  
Jonna Mercado ◽  
...  

Introduction: There are approximately 200,000 cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) annually in the United States. Of these cases, only 40-50% achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and only 20-30% are discharged. Though most hospital staff are trained in cardiac arrest resuscitation, a significant disparity in resuscitation has been noted between different hospital settings. We thus instituted additional structured cardiac arrest training in an Internal Medicine residency program, to supplement the biennial advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that institution of a dedicated structured cardiac arrest team (code team) in addition to monthly training for those on the team, would improve the confidence, skills, and leadership level, of residents at managing an IHCA situation. Methods: A structured code team with specific roles for each resident was instituted in a New York City-based community hospital. Training was guided by audio-visual lectures and then reinforced by performing mock cardiac arrest drills. Resident assessments were done pre and post-training through an anonymous standardized questionnaire. Summative measures of mean confidence, mean ACLS skills, and leadership were evaluated. Uni and bivariate analysis, and T-tests for statistical significance were performed using STATA 15 software. Results: Our sample of 32 residents showed an increase in mean learning scores across all the three domains. Confidence scores increased from 7.23 to 8.44, ACLS skills increased from 7.40 to 8.57 and leadership scores increased from 6.56 to 7.88. Paired T-tests demonstrated high significance (P<0.000). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of additional structured cardiac arrest training on confidence, skills, and leadership of resident physicians in an Internal Medicine program. The next phase of this study will be to re-evaluate knowledge and confidence at 3 and 6 months after training.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Yasir Rehman

Introduction:Residents’ learning and performance depends on program structures, clinical setting and faculty mentors; however,performance differences between and community based vs. university based residents have not been exploredsystematically.Objectives:To systematically review the performance differences between internal medicine residents trained in community-basedprograms [CBPs] versus university-based programs [UBPs] in the US.Methods:Eligible studies were identified in Medline and Embase databases from 1990- June 2018. Eligible studies comparedlearning and performance differences between UBP and CBP internal medicine residency programs aligned withACGME recommendations.Results:Out of 4916 titles, 14 cross-sectional studies were included in the analysis. Diverse reporting among the includedstudies precluded meta-analysis. Significant differences were found in specific practice areas, such as knowledge aboutHIV, nutrition training, and program accreditation cycle. Residents in UBPs participated more often in hypothesisdriven research and had higher publication rates than residents in CBPs. Residents trained in CBPs experienced moreburnt out than those in UBPs and had higher prevalence of residents with problematic behaviors and deficiencies.Nonsignificant differences were found among residents regarding ABIM pass rate, medical procedures, and publichealth training.Conclusion:Our review reports inconsistent trends in residents’ learning and performances following RRC- IM and ACGMErecommendations. Significant differences were noted in areas that required more practice and system based learning,non-procedural skills and patient care. Future studies with larger sample sizes and adjusted analyses are needed toevaluate the difference between residents’ performance and learning in UBPs versus CBPs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
J Mpambara ◽  
J C Musengimana ◽  
V Ruhumuliza ◽  
K Carlson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document