Why nonverbal immediacy matters: A motivation explanation

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Bainbridge Frymier ◽  
Zachary W. Goldman ◽  
Christopher J. Claus
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026540752110330
Author(s):  
Oleksandra Romaniuk ◽  
Larissa Terán

The current study investigates sexual scripts in reality dating shows—in particular, how the gender of the communicator affects the choice of verbal and nonverbal immediacy behaviors aimed at making a first impression. Data were drawn from 331 couples of opposite-sex heterosexual strangers interacting for approximately 30 seconds on two reality dating shows: The Bachelor and The Bachelorette (2012–2019). As a result, a codebook of verbal immediacy cues ( N = 1623) and nonverbal immediacy cues ( N = 3021) was derived. The findings showed that verbal behavior encompassed 11 categories of verbal immediacy cues, while nonverbal behavior included 32 categories of nonverbal immediacy cues. Results also showed gender-related preferences for verbal immediacy behavior; for instance, men were more likely to outline the probability of relationship development and pay compliments; conversely, women were prone to intriguing men to arouse curiosity and interest. As for nonverbal immediacy behavior, men were predisposed to use clothes straightening, while women tended to communicate immediacy through head tilt, shoulder shrug, gaze down, gaze side(s), eyebrow flashes, hand-in-hand, hug, pat, holding hands in front of their bodies, and hair grooming. Nonetheless, the similarities between men and women were found to be greater than the differences. These findings could have wide-reaching implications for theorizing on social and cultural norms, gender stereotypes, and traditional gender roles in intimate relationships in the form of sexual scripts, along with contributing to the study of reality television.


Author(s):  
Linda Talley ◽  
Samuel R Temple

Nonverbal immediacy is a core element of a leader’s ability to lead followers. Nevertheless, there are no empirical studies regarding a link between a leader’s hand gestures and followers’ perceptions of immediacy (attraction to someone) or nonimmediacy (distancing). Guided by Mehrabian’s theory of nonverbal behavior, this study included one independent variable segmented into seven levels (positive hand gestures defined as community hand, humility hands, and steepling hands; three defensive gestures, defined as hands in pocket, arms crossed over chest, and hands behind back; and neutral/no hand gestures) to test for immediacy or nonimmediacy. In this experimental study, participants (<em>n </em>= 300; male = 164; female = 143) were shown one of seven pictures of a leader. Four hypotheses were tested for main and interactional effects and all were supported by the results. Immediate communication received strong support, meaning immediacy on the part of a leader is likely to lead to increased emotional connection to achieve desirable outcomes. This study advances theory from previous research that specific hand gestures are more effective than others at creating immediacy between leaders and followers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 181-192
Author(s):  
Seongmi Jeong ◽  
Dong-Hee Shin ◽  
Jihyang Gu
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 238-241
Author(s):  
Rebecca B. Rubin ◽  
Philip Palmgreen ◽  
Howard E. Sypher

1991 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-210
Author(s):  
Donald W. Klopf ◽  
Catherine A. Thompson ◽  
Satoshi Ishii ◽  
Aino Sallinen-Kuparinen

The Self-assessment of Immediacy scale was administered to 165 Japanese, 229 Finnish, and 147 American university students. The Japanese scored significantly differently from the Finns and Americans, whose means were not significantly different from each other. Means for the women in the three groups were significantly different from the men's.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document