Palliative Healthcare: Cost Reduction and Quality Enhancement Using End-of-Life Survey Methodology

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 53-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Edward Falls
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-96
Author(s):  
Taimoor Siddiqui ◽  
Muhammad Ali Iqbal

Six Sigma has become a leading business improvement methodology which has been successfully applied in a wide range of businesses. In so doing, companies focus on systematically creating value and reducing and removing waste (the lean element of the approach) whilst employing Six Sigma to focus on and to eradicate the Critical to Quality (CTQ) issues that affect an organization. The research strategy of this paper is survey method and primary data was gathered from supply chain and quality enhancement departments of selected Six Sigma companies n Karachi, Pakistan through structured questionnaires. This paper indicates that the performance of the company becomes highly reliable, reduced cost, eliminate wastages, and improve quality by the adaption of Six-Sigma practices. The study also reported that the continuous improvement is also playing a mediating role when we consider Company’s performance as dependent variable and cost reduction, Quality betterment and eliminate wastages as independent variables.


2015 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Abbass ◽  
Steve Kisely ◽  
Daniel Rasic ◽  
Joel M. Town ◽  
Robert Johansson

Author(s):  
Sharon Hems ◽  
Louise Taylor ◽  
Jan Jones ◽  
Eileen Holmes

IntroductionThe Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) advises NHS Scotland on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of new medicines. Since 2014, evidence from patients and carers on end-of-life and orphan medicines has been gathered during Patient and Clinician Engagement (PACE) meetings. The output is a consensus statement which describes the added value of a new medicine from the perspective of the patient/carer and clinician. This study investigates the importance of factors identified through PACE to committee members and how these are used in their decision-making.MethodsSurvey methodology was used to gain an understanding of the factors from the PACE statement that are most likely to influence members (n = 26) in decision-making. The survey instrument was informed by a literature review and observation of PACE and SMC meetings. Likert scale questions were used to determine the relative importance of factors in the PACE statement, including information relating to eight prominent ‘quality of life’ themes (family/carer impact, health benefits, tolerability, psychological benefit, hope, normal life, treatment choice and convenience), that were identified by an earlier thematic analysis of these statements.ResultsAnalysis of survey responses will use mainly descriptive techniques to generate percentages and ranges. Correlation analysis will be considered to investigate relationships between members’ demographics, type of medicine (end-of-life, orphan) and the importance of different factors in the PACE statement. Preliminary results indicate that key quality of life themes highly valued by patients/carers are also important to committee members in their decision making. Challenges in assimilating qualitative patient-based evidence from PACE alongside quantitative clinical and economic data were highlighted.ConclusionsFindings from this survey will provide valuable insight into how PACE evidence is used by SMC decision makers alongside traditional clinical and economic evidence and will help shape future improvements to the PACE methodology.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1356-1362
Author(s):  
Laurence Tan Lean Chin ◽  
Yu Jun Lim ◽  
Wan Ling Choo

Purpose Palliative care is a philosophy of care that encompasses holistic, patient-centric care involving patients and their family members and loved ones. Palliative care patients often have complex needs. A common challenge in managing patients near their end of life is the complexity of navigating clinical decisions and finding achievable and realistic goals of care that are in line with the values and wishes of patients. This often results in differing opinions and conflicts within the multidisciplinary team. Conclusion This article describes a tool derived from the biopsychosocial model and the 4-quadrant ethical model. The authors describe the use of this tool in managing a patient who wishes to have fried chicken despite aspiration risk and how this tool was used to encourage discussions and reduce conflict and distress within the multidisciplinary team.


2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Fried-Oken ◽  
Lisa Bardach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document