scholarly journals Getting an empirical hold of thesustainable university: a comparative analysis of evaluation frameworks across 12 contemporary sustainability assessment tools

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Fischer ◽  
Silke Jenssen ◽  
Valentin Tappeser
2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 1117-1122
Author(s):  
Ayumu Funamoto ◽  
Rikutaro Manabe ◽  
Akito Murayama ◽  
Junichiro Okata

2021 ◽  
Vol 237 ◽  
pp. 04031
Author(s):  
Antonio Sánchez Cordero ◽  
Marta Videras Rodríguez ◽  
Sergio Gómez Melgar ◽  
José Manuel Andujar Márquez

Recently, several urban sustainability assessment tools (USAT) have appeared to reduce the human impact provided by the built environment. Few of them focus on the assessment of urban spaces like squares, streets, and parks, etc., but they don’t operation and maintenance (OM) phase is not considered. It would be necessary to develop an in use holistic urban sustainable assessment tool (UHU2SAT) to specifically assess urban spaces under OM phase. This paper provides a qualitative research among 188 studies, with the aim to classify them according to the impacts they pursue: environmental (ENV), social (SOC) economic (ECO) and Others. Finally, the SOC criteria are reduced up to 21 and arranged into 4 different groups: Human comfort, Urban mobility, SOC Cohesion, and Health & safety. These SOC criteria have been discussed and revised according to the literature review to identify the most suitable indicators for the UHU2SAT. Finally, it can be concluded that this methodology could also be useful to obtain ENV and ECO criteria to provide a holistic assessment of the sustainability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document