scholarly journals Educate – mentor – nurture: improving the transition from initial teacher education to qualified teacher status and beyond

Author(s):  
Anna Lise Gordon
Author(s):  
Jennie Golding

The past five years have seen significant changes to the structures and content of routes to Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) in this country, and to the balance of contributions to these routes between schools and higher education (HE). Such developments do not always address emerging knowledge about the needs of beginner teachers; further, changes have implications for teacher further professional development as well as for the health of education research in this country. However, changes have catalysed overdue evaluation of more established routes and a priori thinking about how such needs could best be met. The Carter Review (DfE, 2014b) offers some useful ways forward that should be complemented by rigorous evaluation of the range of outcomes of initial teacher education over short, medium, and long terms, making full use of the evidence base.


Author(s):  
Lexie Grudnoff ◽  
Eleanor Hawe ◽  
Bryan Tuck

Performance management with teacher appraisal has become mandatory in England and New Zealand. In England there is a single set of comprehensive standards that function as statutory requirements for initial teacher education and certification as a qualified teacher. In New Zealand we have programme requirements for initial teacher education that are not aligned with either the standards for registration or the standards in employment contracts. Moreover in New Zealand the standards are not legal requirements, eg. when recommendations are being made for registration, the Teachers Council’s standards are regarded as indicators of the factors that could be considered. The assumption seems to be that the more coherent and rigorous approach in England will be associated with more effective teaching. This article argues why this may not be the case, and calls for the involvement of teachers and researchers in the development of standards for teacher education and teaching, and the implementation of methods for evaluating teachers’ practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
John Furlong ◽  
Jeremy Griffiths ◽  
Cecilia Hannigan-Davies ◽  
Alma Harris ◽  
Michelle Jones

ZDM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossella Santagata ◽  
Johannes König ◽  
Thorsten Scheiner ◽  
Ha Nguyen ◽  
Ann-Kristin Adleff ◽  
...  

AbstractTeacher noticing has become increasingly acknowledged as a fundamental aspect of teacher professional competence. Teacher education scholars have examined how the development of noticing might be supported both in initial teacher education and in professional development. In mathematics teacher education, several studies have explored the use of video as a supporting tool for teacher noticing. It remains unclear how this body of work builds on the various theoretical perspectives of noticing prevalent in the literature, thus broadening our understanding of noticing. Furthermore, the field has not examined systematically the extent to which research has leveraged the affordances of digital video technologies, and whether scholars have employed different research methods to answer questions that are critical to teacher educators. This survey paper reviews studies published in the last two decades on programs centered on mathematics teacher noticing that used video as a supporting tool for teacher learning. Thirty-five peer-reviewed papers written in English were identified and coded along three dimensions: (1) theoretical perspectives; (2) use of video technologies; and (3) research questions and methods. This review summarizes important findings and highlights several directions for future research. Most studies involved pre-service teachers, and only a few centered on in-service teachers. Developers of the large majority of programs took a cognitive psychological perspective and focused on the attending/perceiving and interpreting/reasoning facets of noticing. Few studies used video-based software and few studies used grouping, and even fewer used randomized grouping. Evidence of program effects on responding and decision making, and on instructional practice, is limited and should be extended in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document