scholarly journals How to fully represent expert information about imprecise properties in a computer system: random sets, fuzzy sets, and beyond: an overview

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 586-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung T. Nguyen ◽  
Vladik Kreinovich
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
O.M. Poleshchuk ◽  

Two models of formalizing group expert information based on fuzzy sets of the second type and Z-numbers have been developed. The construction of fuzzy sets of the second type and components of Z-numbers is carried out using full orthogonal semantic spaces. The construction of semantic spaces is carried out using statistical information or information obtained as a result of a direct survey of experts. The input information for the model based on fuzzy sets of the second type are linguistic estimates of objects. The input information for the model based on Z-numbers are linguistic estimates of objects and the reliability of these estimates. The developed models expand the possibilities of processing expert information, allow preserving the individual characteristics of expert criteria embedded in the data, and at the same time correctly process different types of uncertainty inherent in this data.


2008 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihai Cristian Florea ◽  
Anne-Laure Jousselme ◽  
Dominic Grenier ◽  
Éloi Bossé

Author(s):  
DEQIANG HAN ◽  
CHONGZHAO HAN ◽  
YONG DENG

With the development of uncertainty reasoning and information fusion, there have emerged several theories including fuzzy set theory, Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, probability theory and rough set theory, etc., for representing and dealing with the uncertain information. When the fusion of the uncertain information originated from different sources is needed, how to construct a general framework for different theories of uncertainty or how to establish the connection between different theoretical frameworks has become a crucial problem. Particularly, to combine two kinds of information represented respectively by the BPA and the FMF, this paper proposes two transformations of an FMF into a BPA by solving a constrained maximization or minimization optimization problem. The objective function is the uncertainty degree of the body of evidence (BOE) and the corresponding constraints are established based on the given FMF. In fact the transformation of an FMF into a BPA is the transformation of fuzzy sets into random sets, which is currently accepted as a unified framework for several theories of uncertainty. Our proposed approaches have no predefinition of focal elements and they can be used as the general transformations of fuzzy sets into random sets. Some examples and analyses are provided to illustrate and justify the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed approaches.


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazaros S. Iliadis ◽  
Anastasios K. Papastavrou ◽  
Panagiotis D. Lefakis

Author(s):  
Valeriy Balan

The paper developed a methodical approach to the evaluation and selection of strategic alternatives to businesses based on their prioritization using the tools of fuzzy multi-criteria analysis and fuzzy logic. This approach is based on the use of fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) with a certain term, set for paired comparisons variants and corresponding triangular fuzzy numbers. Evaluation criteria are considered as fuzzy sets defined on universal sets of options (strategic alternatives) using membership functions. Membership functions of fuzzy sets are defined based on expert information on the pairwise comparisons of alternatives using the fuzzy Saaty scale. To ensure the consistency of expert estimates, it is proposed to use the Fuzzy Delphi method. To determine the importance of the evaluation criteria and to calculate fuzzy values priority strategic alternatives for these criteria using the procedure Fuzzy AHP method. The resulting weights of criteria are considered as an appropriate degree of concentration membership functions. The calculation of the integral value of the priority level of strategic alternatives is carried out based on the Bellman-Zade scheme known in the theory of decision-making. For practical implementation of the methodological approach in the Matlab computer system (Fuzzy Logic Toolbox package), a framework is developed, which contains four main blocks: a block of input of expert information on the relative superiority of criteria in pairwise comparison and strategic alternatives to these criteria, a block of calculating weights, criteria a block for calculating fuzzy values of the priority of strategic alternatives according to these criteria and a block for finding the intersection of the obtained fuzzy sets according to the Bellman-Zade scheme. Defuzzification of the obtained fuzzy values is carried out based on the CoA method (Center of Area method). This framework allows you to perform simulations depending on the input data obtained from experts. The developed methodological approach allows the top management of the enterprise to determine the priority of the developed strategies in the presence of only qualitative information on the relative superiority of evaluation criteria and strategic alternatives and expands the possibilities of classical methods of strategic choice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratna Sari Dewi ◽  
Wietske Bijker ◽  
Alfred Stein
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document