ALUMNI SURVEY OF ENTRY GOALS, SATISFACTION, AND JOB BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ASSOCIATE DEGREE

Author(s):  
Joseph Midgen
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Ramachandran K ◽  
Rajesh Yadav ◽  
Sumitra Devkota

Febuxostat used for the treatment of patients with arthritis littered with Hyperuricemia and is utilized in its Chronic Management. a number of the internal organ adverse effects have diode to the employment of febuxostat replaced with with allopurinol drug. Febuxostat, associate degree compound accelerator matter, achieves its therapeutic result by decreasing humour acid. At therapeutic concentrations it is not expected that Febuxostat will inhibit different enzymes which are involved in purine and pyrimidine synthesis and their metabolism. Metabolism of Febuxostat is done by conjugation via uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes and also by UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 and reaction via hemoprotein P450 (CYP) enzymes as well as CYP1A2, 2C8 and 2C9 and non-P450 enzymes. Febuxostat is eliminated primarily through each viscus and excretory organ pathways. Febuxostat could cause heart issues that may result in coronary failure, could cause issues within the blood vessels that visit your brain. this could conjointly result in stroke, urarthritis flare-ups and Liver injury. Some facet effects of febuxostat could occur that sometimes don't would like medical attention. We conclude from our review, vessel Death urarthritis patients with established vessel (CV) illness treated with febuxostat had a better rate of CV death compared to those treated with allopurinol drug in a very CV outcomes study.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Walker ◽  
Maureen Blankemeyer
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenda Y. Nogami ◽  
Julie Colestock ◽  
Terry A. Phoenix ◽  
Robert C. White ◽  
Jr
Keyword(s):  

1973 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl L. Reed ◽  
John F. Feldhusen ◽  
Adrian P. Van Mondfrans

This study investigated the usefulness of a number of noncognitive variables in improving the prediction of students' first semester, second semester, and first-year grade point averages. Freshman nursing students entering five associate degree nursing schools between 1964 and 1967 ( N = 495) were used as the validation sample. The cross-validation sample included the 1968 ( N = 170) entrants. When added to a battery of established cognitive predictors, several noncognitive variables added a unique and significant increment to the prediction of grade point averages in associate degree nursing programs. These variables were: age in months of the student, year of entry into nursing school, level of previous education of the student, and the particular school attended. These results encourage future studies in search of new noncognitive variables to improve prediction. Measures of a student's past health and practical experience might be worthy of future study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document