The transformation of the meaning of death in complicated grief group therapy for survivors of suicide: A treatment process analysis using the meaning of loss codebook

Death Studies ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 553-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Supiano ◽  
Lara Burns Haynes ◽  
Vicki Pond
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Supiano ◽  
Troy Andersen ◽  
Marilyn Luptak ◽  
Cynthia Beynon ◽  
Eli Iacob ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Supiano ◽  
Paula Larsen ◽  
Colin Riley ◽  
Ann Hutton ◽  
Eli Iacob ◽  
...  

Crisis ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M. Mitchell ◽  
Yookyung Kim ◽  
Holly G. Prigerson ◽  
MaryKay Mortimer-Stephens

Summary: Complicated grief is a newly defined and distinctive psychiatric disorder that occurs in response to a significant loss through death. New findings suggest that survivors who were close to the deceased are at heightened risk for complicated grief. Little is known about whether close kinship (spouses, parents, children, siblings, vs. in-laws, aunts/uncles, nieces/nephews, friends, or coworkers) to a suicide victim also represents a heightened risk for complicated grief. Assessing for complicated grief is important, especially with survivors of suicide, because of the potential for associated health risks. This report contains preliminary data from an exploratory, descriptive pilot study examining complicated grief in adult survivors of suicide. Sixty bereaved subjects, within one month after the suicide of a family member or significant other, were assessed for complicated grief symptoms. Statistically significant differences, as measured with the Inventory of Complicated Grief, were noted between closely related and distantly related survivors of the suicide victim. These preliminary results indicate that health care professional's assessments and interventions for complicated grief should take into consideration the bereaved's familial and/or social relationship to the deceased. The closely related survivors of suicide had higher levels of complicated grief and could be at risk of developing physical and/or mental health problems, including suicidal ideation, in the future.


Psychiatry ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kealy ◽  
Carlos A. Sierra-Hernandez ◽  
William E. Piper ◽  
Anthony S. Joyce ◽  
Rene Weideman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 17m11592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney Zisook ◽  
M. Katherine Shear ◽  
Charles F. Reynolds ◽  
Naomi M. Simon ◽  
Christine Mauro ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-529
Author(s):  
Racheli Assaf Bitan

This article proposes a conceptualization of symptoms from an interpersonal perspective and advocates group analysis as an appropriate medium for treatment. Psychoanalytic theory has traditionally conceptualized symptoms using the language of intrapsychic conflicts in the individual’s mind. In this article, drawing on ideas from group analysis and contemporary psychoanalytic theories, I propose an interpersonal conceptualization of symptomatic phenomenology. In addition, I introduce a concept that describes a treatment process based on this perspective: Relations Training in Action1. I will argue that a symptom occurring in one person symbolizes an inadequate interpersonal relations pattern, and that recognition of the pathological relations pattern in therapy enables a process which paddles the creation of healthier communication. Furthermore, I suggest group therapy as a space which offers a rich set of opportunities for the repetition and reparation of relations disorder (Friedman, 2007), and that the transition from the language of intrapsychic symptoms to the language of relationships plays a significant role in broadening the areas of interpersonal communication (Foulkes, 1964). Therapy based on an interpersonal perspective regarding symptoms will facilitate participation in a meaningful and significant relationship with the other, improve the mental health of patients and decrease their need to cling to the symptom.


Author(s):  
Sigmund Karterud

Ideally, the assessment phase of patients who are referred to mentalization-based treatment (MBT) should conclude with a mentalization- based case formulation. The structure and content of such case formulations are described. Their aim are: i) to enhance treatment alliance and ii) to provide some structure to the treatment process through suggesting privileged themes related to emotions, relational patterns and mentalizing. MBT is a conjoint kind of psychotherapy, integrating individual and group therapies. Case formulations has belonged to the tradition of individual psychotherapy, while being mostly ignored by group therapists. The question is: are case formulations also relevant for group psychotherapy? How can they be properly introduced while not disturbing the group processes? The theme is discussed through a clinical vignette that illuminates typical therapeutic challenges in dynamic group psychotherapy with borderline patients. The author concludes with some suggestions for clinical structure, process and research.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Supiano ◽  
Lara Burns Haynes ◽  
Paula A. Larsen

2003 ◽  
Vol 191 (8) ◽  
pp. 524-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Ogrodniczuk ◽  
Anthony S. Joyce ◽  
William E. Piper

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document