Changes in Urinary Bone Resorption Markers (Pyridinoline, Deoxypyridinoline) Resulting from Experimentally-Induced Osteoarthritis in the Temporomandibular Joint of Rats

CRANIO® ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masae Imada ◽  
Kotaro Tanimoto ◽  
Shigeru Ohno ◽  
Akiko Sasaki ◽  
Hiroki Sugiyama ◽  
...  
ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
R. WAELCHLI ◽  
CH. BEERLI ◽  
H. MEIGEL ◽  
L. REVESZ

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebeca Reyes-García ◽  
Pedro Rozas-Moreno ◽  
Gema López-Gallardo ◽  
Antonia García-Martín ◽  
Mariela Varsavsky ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. 1070-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimpei Fujita ◽  
Keishoku Sakuraba ◽  
Atsushi Kubota ◽  
Kenta Wakamatsu ◽  
Natsue Koikawa

AbstractIn this study, we aim to clarify the influence based on bone resorption markers at onset of stress fracture. Also, we will clarify the state of the bone resorption markers of female long distance runners who have a history of stress fracture and also ones who routinely practices running long distances. Participants comprised 19 female long distance athletes. The survey period was 2011–2014, and we measured u-NTX as a bone resorption marker at least twice a year, taking the mean±SD of the periodic measured values without stress fracture as the mean value. Measurements were collected sample when stress fractures developed. 132 u-NTX measurements were taken from 19 participants. As a result, the average was 41.03±12.31 nmolBCE/mmolCRE (Q1: 33.15, Q2: 40.55, Q3: 47.95). In six of the 19 participants, u-NTX could be measured following a stress fracture. The mean value of u-NTX for those participants was 40.16±9.10 nmolBCE/mmolCRE, increasing to 64.08±16.07 nmolBCE/mmol CRE with the stress fracture (p<0.01). The findings showed that, in adult female long distance runners, u-NTX values when there was no stress fracture were within the standard value for mean premenopausal women, but increased when the athletes suffered from a stress fracture.


2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 754-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudha Visvanathan ◽  
Stefan Daniluk ◽  
Rafał Ptaszyński ◽  
Ulf Müller-Ladner ◽  
Meera Ramanujam ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, efficacy and therapeutic mechanism of BI 655064, an antagonistic anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR).MethodsIn total, 67 patients were randomised to receive weekly subcutaneous doses of 120 mg BI 655064 (n=44) or placebo (n=23) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug.ResultsAt week 12, the primary endpoint was not met, with 68.2% of patients treated with BI 655064 achieving an ACR20 vs 45.5% with placebo (p=0.064); using Bayesian analysis, the posterior probability of seeing a difference greater than 35% was 42.9%. BI 655064 was associated with greater changes in CD40–CD40L pathway-related markers, including reductions in inflammatory and bone resorption markers (interleukin-6, matrix metalloproteinase-3, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand), concentration of autoantibodies (immunoglobulin [Ig]G rheumatoid factor [RF], IgM RF, IgA RF) and CD95+ activated B-cell subsets. No serious adverse events (AEs) related to BI 655064 treatment or thromboembolic events occurred; reported AEs were mainly of mild intensity.ConclusionAlthough blockade of the CD40–CD40L pathway with BI 655064 in MTX-IR patients with RA resulted in marked changes in clinical and biological parameters, including reductions in activated B-cells, autoantibody production and inflammatory and bone resorption markers, with a favourable safety profile, clinical efficacy was not demonstrated in this small phase IIa study.Trial registration numberNCT01751776


1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Yamasaki ◽  
Kanji Fukuda ◽  
Seisuke Tanaka

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1695-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Nanchen ◽  
◽  
J. Cornuz ◽  
C. Ruffieux ◽  
W. Riesen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document