Training addiction counselors to deliver a brief psychoeducational intervention for chronic pain among patients in opioid agonist treatment: A pilot investigation

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna L. Butner ◽  
Curtis Bone ◽  
Caridad C. Ponce Martinez ◽  
Grace Kwon ◽  
Mark Beitel ◽  
...  
Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick H Finan ◽  
Janelle Letzen ◽  
David H Epstein ◽  
Chung Jung Mun ◽  
Samuel Stull ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Evidence suggests that blunted reward responsiveness may account for poor clinical outcomes in both opioid use disorder (OUD) and chronic pain. Understanding how individuals with OUD and comorbid chronic pain (OUD+CP) respond to rewards is, therefore, of clinical interest because it may reveal a potential point of behavioral intervention. Methods Patients with OUD (n = 28) and OUD+CP (n = 19) on opioid agonist treatment were compared on: 1) the Probabilistic Reward Task (an objective behavioral measure of reward response bias) and 2) ecological momentary assessment of affective responses to pleasurable events. Results Both the OUD and the OUD+CP groups evidenced an increase in reward response bias in the Probabilistic Reward Task. The rate of change in response bias across blocks was statistically significant in the OUD group (B = 0.06, standard error [SE] = 0.02, t = 3.92, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03 to 0.09) but not in the OUD+CP group (B = 0.03, SE = 0.02, t = 1.90, P = 0.07, 95% CI: −0.002 to 0.07). However, groups did not significantly differ in the rate of change in response bias across blocks (B = 0.03, SE = 0.02, t = 1.21, P = 0.23, 95% CI: −0.02 to 0.07). Groups did not significantly differ on state measures of reward responsiveness (P’s ≥0.50). Conclusions Overall, findings across objective and subjective measures were mixed, necessitating follow-up with a larger sample. The results suggest that although there is a reward response bias in patients with OUD+CP treated with opioid agonist treatment relative to patients with OUD without CP, it is modest and does not appear to translate into patients’ responses to rewarding events as they unfold in daily life.


2021 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 103088
Author(s):  
Kristen A. Morin ◽  
Shreedhar Acharya ◽  
Joseph K. Eibl ◽  
David C. Marsh

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Lintzeris ◽  
Rachel M. Deacon ◽  
Victoria Hayes ◽  
Tracy Cowan ◽  
Llewellyn Mills ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e040556
Author(s):  
Des Crowley ◽  
Robyn Homeniuk ◽  
Ide Delargy

IntroductionThe global opioid-related disease burden is significant. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) can be effective in reducing illicit opioid use and fatal overdose, and improving multiple health and social outcomes. Despite evidence for its effectiveness, there are significant deficits in OAT globally. COVID-19 has required rapid adaptation of remote models of healthcare. Telemedicine is not used routinely in OAT, and little is known about the current levels of use and effectiveness. The objective of this review is to describe models of telemedicine and their efficacy.Methods and analysisThis scoping review uses the review methodology described by Arksey and O’Malley and adapted by Levac et al. The search strategy developed by the medical librarian at the Irish College of General Practitioners in conjunction with the research team will involve five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo and OpenGrey) and the hand searching of reference lists. A limited initial search of two databases will be completed to refine search terms, followed by a second comprehensive search using newly refined search terms of all databases and finally hand searching references of included studies. To be included, studies must report on remote ways of providing OAT (including assessment, induction and monitoring) or related psychosocial support; be published in English after 2010. Two researchers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles considered for inclusion. Data will be extracted onto an agreed template and will undergo a descriptive analysis of the contextual or process-oriented data and simple quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics.Ethics and disseminationResearch ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. The results of this scoping review will inform the development of a national remote model of OAT. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.


2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 683-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Fairgrieve ◽  
Nadia Fairbairn ◽  
Jeffrey H. Samet ◽  
Seonaid Nolan

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-309
Author(s):  
Jack Stone ◽  
Louisa Degenhardt ◽  
Jason Grebely ◽  
Sarah Larney ◽  
Frederick L Altice ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document