scholarly journals Keeping confidence: HIV and the criminal law from HIV service providers’ perspectives

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Dodds ◽  
Matthew Weait ◽  
Adam Bourne ◽  
Siri Egede
AIDS Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1119-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher O. Obong'o ◽  
Latrice C. Pichon ◽  
Terrinieka W. Powell ◽  
Andrea L. Williams

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. S101-S102
Author(s):  
Nicole Liddon ◽  
Lisa Carver ◽  
Leah Robin ◽  
Christopher Harper ◽  
Andrew Herbert ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 468-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren B. Beach ◽  
George J. Greene ◽  
Peter Lindeman ◽  
Amy K. Johnson ◽  
Christian N. Adames ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Stephenson ◽  
Alison Walsh ◽  
Tanaka Chavanduka ◽  
Gregory Sallabank ◽  
Keith Horvath ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Central to measuring the impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on HIV is understanding the role of loss of access to essential HIV prevention and care services created by clinic and community-based organization closures. OBJECTIVE In this paper, we use data from a large, randomized controlled trial for adolescent GBMSM aged 13-18 to map HIV prevention services in four corridors of the US heavily impacted by HIV METHODS We identified and mapped LGBTQ+ friendly services offering at least one of the following HIV-related services: HIV testing; STI testing, PrEP/PEP; HIV treatment and care; other HIV-related services in 109 counties across four major interstate corridors heavily affected by HIV (US Census regions: Pacific (San Francisco, CA to San Diego, CA; 14 counties); South-Atlantic (Washington, DC to Atlanta, GA; 57 counties). RESULTS There were a total of 831 LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV service providers across the 109 counties. There was a range of LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV-service provider availability across counties (range: 0-14.33 per 10,000 youth aged 13-24 (IQR: 2.13), median: 1.09); 9 (8.26%) analyzed counties did not have any LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV service providers. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the correlation between county HIV prevalence and LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV service provider density was 0.16 (p=0.09), suggesting only a small, non-statistically significant linear relationship between a county’s available LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV service providers and their HIV burden. CONCLUSIONS As the COVID-19 epidemic continues, we must find novel, affordable ways to continue to provide sexual health, mental health and support services to LGBTQ+ youth. CLINICALTRIAL NA


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0249740
Author(s):  
Rob Stephenson ◽  
Alison R. Walsh ◽  
Tanaka M. D. Chavanduka ◽  
Gregory Sallabank ◽  
Keith J. Horvath ◽  
...  

Background Central to measuring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV is understanding the role of loss of access to essential HIV prevention and care services created by clinic and community-based organization closures. In this paper, we use a comprehensive list of HIV prevention services in four corridors of the US heavily impacted by HIV, developed as part of a large RCT, to illustrate the potential impact of service closure on LGBTQ+ youth. Methods We identified and mapped LGBTQ+ friendly services offering at least one of the following HIV-related services: HIV testing; STI testing; PrEP/PEP; HIV treatment and care; and other HIV-related services in 109 counties across four major interstate corridors heavily affected by HIV US Census regions: Pacific (San Francisco, CA to San Diego, CA); South-Atlantic (Washington, DC to Atlanta, GA); East-North-Central (Chicago, IL to Detroit, MI); and East-South-Central (Memphis, TN to New Orleans, LA). Results There were a total of 831 LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV service providers across the 109 counties. There was a range of LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV-service provider availability across counties (range: 0–14.33 per 10,000 youth aged 13–24 (IQR: 2.13), median: 1.09); 9 (8.26%) analyzed counties did not have any LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV service providers. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the correlation between county HIV prevalence and LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV service provider density was 0.16 (p = 0.09), suggesting only a small, non-statistically significant linear relationship between a county’s available LGBTQ+ youth-friendly HIV service providers and their HIV burden. Conclusions As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we must find novel, affordable ways to continue to provide sexual health, mental health and other support services to LGBTQ+ youth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document