scholarly journals Exploring the perspective of patients with musculoskeletal health problems in primary care on the use of patient-reported outcome measures to stimulate quality improvement in physiotherapist practice; a qualitative study.

Author(s):  
Guus A. Meerhoff ◽  
Simone A. van Dulmen ◽  
Marjo J.M. Maas ◽  
Annick Bakker-Jacobs ◽  
Maria W.G. Nijhuis-Van der Sanden ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 3157-3166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasneem L. Talib ◽  
Paige DeChant ◽  
Jacob Kean ◽  
Patrick O. Monahan ◽  
David A. Haggstrom ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 812
Author(s):  
Ahmed Alhowimel ◽  
Faris Alodaibi ◽  
Mazyad Alotaibi ◽  
Dalyah Alamam ◽  
Julie Fritz

Background and objectives: The use of appropriate outcome measures can help guide multidimensional low back pain (LBP) management, elucidate the efficacy/effectiveness of interventions, and inform clinicians when selected targets have been achieved and this can be used for educational or research purposes. Aim: This study aimed to explore and describe the use, attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs regarding patient-reported outcome measures used by healthcare practitioners practising in Saudi Arabia who are frequently involved in the healthcare of individuals with LBP. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional design was undertaken using a web-based survey. An electronic invitation to participate was sent to primary care physicians and physical therapists practising in Saudi Arabia. The survey included three sections: demographic data, a list of the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measures with LBP patients, and statements regarding attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs about outcome measures. Results: A total of 156 practitioners participated: 45 primary care physicians and 111 physical therapists. The numeric pain rating and visual analogue scales were the outcome measures most frequently reported as being often used by both primary care physicians and physical therapists. The majority of participants reported often using 1–2 patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). While most participants indicated that they were confident at selecting the most appropriate PROM, fewer were familiar with the concept of the minimally important clinical difference. A lack of Arabic versions of PROMs was reported as a barrier to using them to assess pain. Conclusions: This study shows that, although primary care physicians and physical therapists in Saudi Arabia frequently use patient-reported outcome measures in their clinical management of patients with LBP, there is a noticeable gap in the knowledge and use of the multidimensional outcome measures for LBP management among the participants. This highlights a need for professional training on the use of standardised outcome measures related to LBP.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 2105-2121
Author(s):  
Daria Tai ◽  
Eric Li ◽  
Teresa Liu-Ambrose ◽  
Nick Bansback ◽  
Mohsen Sadatsafavi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document