Understanding donor motivations

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Szczepanski
Keyword(s):  
Transfusion ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 2098-2105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. France ◽  
Jennifer M. Kowalsky ◽  
Janis L. France ◽  
Lina K. Himawan ◽  
Debra A. Kessler ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesham Abdeldayem ◽  
Samy Kashkoush ◽  
Bassem Soliman Hegab ◽  
Amr Aziz ◽  
Hany Shoreem ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 34-54
Author(s):  
E.E. Symaniuk ◽  
◽  
I.G. Polyakova ◽  
A.G. Andal ◽  
◽  
...  

This article explores the motivations behind Russian men’s altruistic sperm donation using Alderfer's Existence-Relatedness-Growth (ERG) model. Among the sample of 86 men, altru-istic motivation is mostly driven by existence and relatedness. Correlations tests indicated two patterns: 1) men driven by existence needs are more willing to maintain contact with the future child and less prone to self-promotion; 2) men driven by relatedness needs demon-strate the opposite characteristics. These results contribute to further research of reproductive donor motivations in Russia.


Sociology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-362
Author(s):  
Nicky Hudson

This article considers the sociological utility of the ‘imaginary’ for understanding how a growing number of women who seek to conceive using donated eggs might make sense of their future desires, hopes and ambivalences. By combining the imaginary with insights from authors working on ideas about everyday or ‘ordinary’ ethics it considers how deliberations about egg donation take place and how future motherhood is constructed. Three main aspects of what are referred to as ‘egg donation imaginaries’ are defined: ‘imagining donor egg motherhood’; ‘imagining donor motivations’; and ‘imagining the donor’. The article illustrates how the imaginary is a valuable analytical device because it illuminates how ideas, ambivalences, deliberations and reflections about future family building are deeply social, embodied and reflexive. The imaginary advances sociological theorising of reproduction more generally and helps to bridge existing tensions between individual practices and wider social and policy imaginaries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesham Abdeldayem ◽  
Samy Kashkoush ◽  
Bassem Soliman Hegab ◽  
Amr Aziz ◽  
Hany Shoreem ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen J. Staurowsky ◽  
Bonnie Parkhouse ◽  
Michael Sachs

This paper emanates from a larger project consisting of three phases related to the examination of athletic donor behavior and motivation. This paper focuses specifically on the first phase of that study, which dealt with the development of an instrument to measure athletic donor behavior and motivation using a theoretical model. The Birch and Veroff (1966) paradigm of human motivation was incorporated into a research design that sought to identify the multidimensional aspects of athletic donor behavior and motivation. The Athletic Contributions Questionnaire originally developed by Billing, Holt, and Smith (1985) was revised to reflect incentive motivation factors found in the Birch and Veroff model. The revised instrument was called the ACQUIRE-II.1 One hundred randomly selected participants from each of 2 donor groups from a Division I institution and each of 2 donor groups from a Division III institution (total N=400) completed the ACQUIRE-II with a 50.5% rate of response. An exploratory principal components analysis showed that over 70% of donor motivations for giving could be explained by 6 factors: Benefits, Philanthropic, Power, Social, Success 1, and Success2.


2010 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 272-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Kasraian

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The adequacy of blood depends on blood donation rates and numbers of blood donors. To prepare adequate blood supplies, it is essential to investigate the barriers and factors that stop individuals from donating. This study aimed to identify the causes of lapsed donation at our center. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study of volunteer blood donors in Shiraz, Iran. METHODS: We selected 850 donors who had donated between January 1, 2005 and June 1, 2005, but had not donated again by June 2008. The participants were recruited by letter and telephone, and were interviewed using a specially designed questionnaire that contained items on demographic characteristics, donor motivations and reasons for not returning to donate. We used the chi-square test to identify associations between lapsed donor characteristics and reasons for declining to donate. RESULTS: The greatest motivation for donation was altruism. The most frequent reasons for lapsed donation were lack of time because of work and self-exclusion for medical reasons. Among first-time donors, the most frequent reasons were unsuitability for donation and lack of time. CONCLUSIONS: The reasons for not returning to donate are varied and may correlate with demographic characteristics. In this study, the main reason for not returning was lack of time. Changing donation hours so that donors can donate after work, providing mobile teams at workplaces, and shortening the duration of the donation process may help increase repeat donation rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document