scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Health Belief Model Variables in Predicting Behavior

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Carpenter
Keyword(s):  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Predicting Behavior ◽  
Belief Model

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Health Belief Model Variables in Predicting Behavior

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Carpenter
Keyword(s):  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Positive Health ◽  
Predicting Behavior ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
The Health Belief Model ◽  
Versus Treatment

The Health Belief Model (Rosenstock, 1966) was constructed to explain which beliefs should be targeted in communication campaigns to cause positive health behaviors. The model specifies that if individuals perceives a negative health outcome to be severe, perceives themselves to be susceptible to it, perceives the benefits to behaviors which reduce the likelihood of that outcome to be high, and perceives the barriers to adopting those behaviors to be low, then the behavior is likely. A meta-analysis of 18 studies (2,702 subjects) was conducted to determine if measures of these beliefs could longitudinally predict behavior. Benefits and barriers were consistently the strongest predictors. The length of time between measurement of the HBM beliefs and behavior, prevention versus treatment behaviors, and drug taking regimens v. other behaviors were identified as moderators of the HBM variables’ predictive power.

A meta-analysis of studies of the Health Belief Model with adults

1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Harrison ◽  
Patricia D. Mullen ◽  
Lawrence W. Green
Keyword(s):  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
The Health Belief Model

scholarly journals Effect of Perceived Benefit on Pap Smear Examination Uptake in Women of Reproductive Age: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari ◽  
Rita Benya Adriani ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Women Of Reproductive Age ◽  
Smear Examination ◽  
Perceived Benefit ◽  
Belief Model

ABSTRACT Background: Cervical cancer is the second most common type of cancer in women. Pap smear examination can detect early and prevent late diagnosis of cervical cancer. Perception of benefits is one of the constructs of the Health Belief Model that can predict women’s intention in having a Pap smear. This study aimed to examine the effect of perceived benefit on Pap smear uptake using a meta-analysis. Subjects and Method: A meta analysis was conducted by searching articles from PubMed, Springer Link, Google Scholar databases. Keywords used “Health Belief Model” OR “HBM” OR “Perceived Benefit” AND “Pap smear” OR “Pap Test”. The inclusion criteria were full text, articles published from 2014 to 2019, and using cross sectional study design. The articles were selected by PRISMA flow chart. The quantitative data were analyzed by RevMan 5.3. Results: There were 6 articles that met the criteria. This study reported that strong perceived benefit increased Pap smear uptake in women of reproductive age (aOR= 1.15; 95% CI= 1.06 to 1.24; p<0.001) with I2 = 88%. Conclusion: Strong perceived benefit increases Pap smear uptake in women of reproductive age. Keywords: perceived benefit, pap smear, cervical cancer, health belief model Correspondence: Maranata. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: [email protected]. Mobile: 085867548771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/the7thicph.03.133

scholarly journals Application of Health Belief Model on Breast Self-Examination: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-231
Author(s):  
Maranata Maranata ◽  
◽  
Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari ◽  
Rita Benya Adriyani ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Breast Self Examination ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
Self Examination

scholarly journals Applying the health belief model and behavior of diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-220
Author(s):  
Omid Khosravizadeh ◽  
Bahman Ahadinezhad ◽  
Aisa Maleki ◽  
Pariya Vosoughi ◽  
Zahra Najafpour
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Belief Model ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
The Health Belief Model

The validity of health belief model variables in predicting behavioral change

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaelan Sumo Sulat ◽  
Yayi Suryo Prabandari ◽  
Rossi Sanusi ◽  
Elsi Dwi Hapsari ◽  
Budiono Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Belief Model ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Behavioral Change ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Belief ◽  
Behavioral Changes ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Belief Model

Purpose The health belief model (HBM) is the behavioral change theory most widely used in health behavior studies. Several studies have identified the limitations of this model, one of which concerns the validity in predicting behavioral changes. The purpose of this paper, scoping review, is to map the validity of HBM variables in predicting behavioral changes based on available synthesized evidences. Design/methodology/approach A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. PubMed, Health Evidence, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar were searched using a combination of keywords: health belief model, review, systematic review and meta-analysis between February 15 and March 18, 2016. Findings Of the 1,457 articles, 4 met the inclusion criteria. All results showed that HBM variables were consistently related to behaviors and the strength of the correlation were varied. Perceived barriers and perceived benefits were the strongest predictor, while perceived severity was the weakest. The association between HBM variables and behaviors was moderated by some aspects of behavioral outcomes, the study design and the time interval between measurement of the HBM variables and behavior. Originality/value Although the four main variables of HBM have been shown to be related to behavior, the overall outcomes are varied and have not demonstrated conclusive evidence during the last ten years. The results of this scoping review imply the need for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results of recent studies. In addition, more longitudinal studies are needed to ensure the validity of HBM variables by considering any possible moderators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document