Tillage Requirements of Sweet Corn, Field Pea, and Watermelon Following Stocker Cattle Grazing

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Balkcom ◽  
D. W. Reeves ◽  
J. M. Kemble ◽  
R. A. Dawkins ◽  
R. L. Raper
2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Kynzie McNeill ◽  
Ryan R Reuter ◽  
Paul A Beck

Abstract A 72-d trial was conducted to estimate the combined effect of forage allowance and a fiber-based energy supplement in stocker cattle grazing wheat. Eight pastures (2.7 to 5.1 ha) each contained seven test steers (initial BW = 210 ± 36 kg). Weekly, additional steers were stocked in each pasture in a put and take method to achieve forage allowance of either 2.5 or 5.5 kg forage DM / kg steer BW (4 pastures each). Two pastures in each forage allowance were fed daily with a supplement containing 50% wheat midds and 50% soybean hulls at the rate of 1.5 kg per steer. Forage mass was measured twice weekly using a calibrated rising plate meter. Cattle were weighed weekly on calibrated scales. Data were analyzed using linear regression with pasture as the experimental unit. Mean ADG was 1.36 kg/d. One pasture in the high forage allowance, non-supplemented treatment was removed because we were unable to maintain the designed forage allowance. The interaction of forage allowance and supplement was not significant (P = 0.37) for ADG, and supplementation did not affect ADG (P = 0.20), however increased forage allowance tended to improve ADG (P = 0.06, 0.21 kg ADG per kg forage allowance). To further investigate forage DMI, a 14-d trial began on day 36. Three of the seven test steers in each pasture were randomly chosen and administered 7 ± 0.1 g of TiO2 daily at 0700 as an external marker to estimate fecal output. Forage DMI (at an assumed 72% DM digestibility) averaged 2.1% of midpoint BW, below our expectation. Additional forage allowance tended to improve estimated forage DMI (P= 0.06), but supplement had minimal effect (P = 0.30).


2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 387-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Fares ◽  
Adam Bensley ◽  
Haimanote Bayabil ◽  
Ripendra Awal ◽  
Samira Fares ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 36-36
Author(s):  
P A Gunter ◽  
R W Peacock ◽  
R B Muntifering ◽  
M K Mullenix

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
P. A. Gunter ◽  
R. W. Peacock ◽  
R. B. Muntifering ◽  
M. K. Mullenix

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
L R Thompson ◽  
M R Beck ◽  
G D Williams ◽  
S E Place ◽  
R Reuter

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Beck ◽  
D.S. Hubbell ◽  
K.B. Watkins ◽  
S.A. Gunter ◽  
L.B. Daniels

1905 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Frank T. Emerson ◽  
Lowell Emerson ◽  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Kynzie McNeill ◽  
Ryan R Reuter ◽  
Paul A Beck

Abstract A 72-d trial was conducted to estimate the combined effect of forage allowance and a fiber-based energy supplement in stocker cattle grazing wheat. Eight pastures (2.7 to 5.1 ha) each contained seven test steers (initial BW = 210 ± 36 kg). Weekly, additional steers were stocked in each pasture in a put and take method to achieve forage allowance of either 2.5 or 5.5 kg forage DM / kg steer BW (4 pastures each). Two pastures in each forage allowance were fed daily with a supplement containing 50% wheat midds and 50% soybean hulls at the rate of 1.5 kg per steer. Forage mass was measured twice weekly using a calibrated rising plate meter. Cattle were weighed weekly on calibrated scales. Data were analyzed using linear regression with pasture as the experimental unit. Mean ADG was 1.36 kg/d. One pasture in the high forage allowance, non-supplemented treatment was removed because we were unable to maintain the designed forage allowance. The interaction of forage allowance and supplement was not significant (P = 0.37) for ADG, and supplementation did not affect ADG (P = 0.20), however increased forage allowance tended to improve ADG (P = 0.06, 0.21 kg ADG per kg forage allowance). To further investigate forage DMI, a 14-d trial began on day 36. Three of the seven test steers in each pasture were randomly chosen and administered 7 ± 0.1 g of TiO2 daily at 0700 as an external marker to estimate fecal output. Forage DMI (at an assumed 72% DM digestibility) averaged 2.1% of midpoint BW, below our expectation. Additional forage allowance tended to improve estimated forage DMI (P= 0.06), but supplement had minimal effect (P = 0.30).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document