scholarly journals 62 Effects of forage allowance and supplementation on performance of steers grazing wheat pasture

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Kynzie McNeill ◽  
Ryan R Reuter ◽  
Paul A Beck

Abstract A 72-d trial was conducted to estimate the combined effect of forage allowance and a fiber-based energy supplement in stocker cattle grazing wheat. Eight pastures (2.7 to 5.1 ha) each contained seven test steers (initial BW = 210 ± 36 kg). Weekly, additional steers were stocked in each pasture in a put and take method to achieve forage allowance of either 2.5 or 5.5 kg forage DM / kg steer BW (4 pastures each). Two pastures in each forage allowance were fed daily with a supplement containing 50% wheat midds and 50% soybean hulls at the rate of 1.5 kg per steer. Forage mass was measured twice weekly using a calibrated rising plate meter. Cattle were weighed weekly on calibrated scales. Data were analyzed using linear regression with pasture as the experimental unit. Mean ADG was 1.36 kg/d. One pasture in the high forage allowance, non-supplemented treatment was removed because we were unable to maintain the designed forage allowance. The interaction of forage allowance and supplement was not significant (P = 0.37) for ADG, and supplementation did not affect ADG (P = 0.20), however increased forage allowance tended to improve ADG (P = 0.06, 0.21 kg ADG per kg forage allowance). To further investigate forage DMI, a 14-d trial began on day 36. Three of the seven test steers in each pasture were randomly chosen and administered 7 ± 0.1 g of TiO2 daily at 0700 as an external marker to estimate fecal output. Forage DMI (at an assumed 72% DM digestibility) averaged 2.1% of midpoint BW, below our expectation. Additional forage allowance tended to improve estimated forage DMI (P= 0.06), but supplement had minimal effect (P = 0.30).

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Kynzie McNeill ◽  
Ryan R Reuter ◽  
Paul A Beck

Abstract A 72-d trial was conducted to estimate the combined effect of forage allowance and a fiber-based energy supplement in stocker cattle grazing wheat. Eight pastures (2.7 to 5.1 ha) each contained seven test steers (initial BW = 210 ± 36 kg). Weekly, additional steers were stocked in each pasture in a put and take method to achieve forage allowance of either 2.5 or 5.5 kg forage DM / kg steer BW (4 pastures each). Two pastures in each forage allowance were fed daily with a supplement containing 50% wheat midds and 50% soybean hulls at the rate of 1.5 kg per steer. Forage mass was measured twice weekly using a calibrated rising plate meter. Cattle were weighed weekly on calibrated scales. Data were analyzed using linear regression with pasture as the experimental unit. Mean ADG was 1.36 kg/d. One pasture in the high forage allowance, non-supplemented treatment was removed because we were unable to maintain the designed forage allowance. The interaction of forage allowance and supplement was not significant (P = 0.37) for ADG, and supplementation did not affect ADG (P = 0.20), however increased forage allowance tended to improve ADG (P = 0.06, 0.21 kg ADG per kg forage allowance). To further investigate forage DMI, a 14-d trial began on day 36. Three of the seven test steers in each pasture were randomly chosen and administered 7 ± 0.1 g of TiO2 daily at 0700 as an external marker to estimate fecal output. Forage DMI (at an assumed 72% DM digestibility) averaged 2.1% of midpoint BW, below our expectation. Additional forage allowance tended to improve estimated forage DMI (P= 0.06), but supplement had minimal effect (P = 0.30).


Author(s):  
P A Gunter ◽  
M K Mullenix ◽  
L C Burdette ◽  
R B Muntifering

Abstract A 2-yr grazing experiment was conducted to evaluate efficacy of nitrogen (N) fertilization, interseeded legumes and protein supplementation for N delivery to stocker cattle grazing annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Each yr, 90 steers (initial BW, 241 ± 13 kg) were assigned to the following N-delivery methods, with or without monensin fed in a free-choice mineral supplement as a 5 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: ryegrass fertilized with 112 kg N/ha (NFERT); ryegrass interseeded with crimson clover (CC, Trifolium incarnatum); ryegrass interseeded with arrowleaf clover (AC, Trifolium vesiculosum); ryegrass plus distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) supplemented at 0.65% BW daily; and ryegrass plus whole cottonseed (WCS) supplemented at 0.65% BW daily. Pastures within the interseeded-clover and protein-supplementation treatments were fertilized with 56 kg N/ha at time of establishment. Steers were weighed every 28 d, and forage mass (FM, kg DM/ha) was measured concurrently using the destructive harvest/disk meter double-sampling method. Each of 30 0.81-ha paddocks was stocked initially with 3 ‘tester’ steers, and stocking density (steers/ha) was adjusted using ‘put-and-take steers’ based on changes in FM and steer BW in order to maintain a uniform forage allowance (FA) of 1 kg DM/kg steer BW. Grazing was discontinued on May 11, 2016 in Yr 1 and May 10, 2017 in Yr 2 following 140 and 84 d of grazing, respectively. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design with repeated measures for which pasture (n = 3) was the experimental unit. Ionophore inclusion did not affect (P > 0.10) any variable measured. Mean FM differed (P < 0.0001) between yr and among N-delivery methods (P < 0.10), and mean FA differed (P = 0.005) among N-delivery methods. Steer ADG differed among N-delivery methods (P = 0.02) and between yr (P < 0.001), whereas total gain/ha differed (P < 0.0008) among N-delivery methods, but not between yr (P = 0.78). Stocking density differed among N-delivery methods (P = 0.02) and between yr (P < 0.0001), and grazing-days/ha differed between yr (P < 0.0001) and among N-delivery methods (P = 0.001). Results indicate that supplementation with a high-protein by-product feed for cattle grazing annual ryegrass maintained ADG, total gain/ha and grazing-days/ha compared with N-fertilized annual ryegrass, and increased ADG, total gain/ha and grazing-days over interseeded legumes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 36-36
Author(s):  
P A Gunter ◽  
R W Peacock ◽  
R B Muntifering ◽  
M K Mullenix

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
P. A. Gunter ◽  
R. W. Peacock ◽  
R. B. Muntifering ◽  
M. K. Mullenix

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
L R Thompson ◽  
M R Beck ◽  
G D Williams ◽  
S E Place ◽  
R Reuter

1981 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. Horn ◽  
T. L. Mader ◽  
S. L. Armbruster ◽  
R. R. Frahm

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Beck ◽  
D.S. Hubbell ◽  
K.B. Watkins ◽  
S.A. Gunter ◽  
L.B. Daniels

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document