69 Supplementing Energy in Conjunction with Monensin Improves Sustainability of Stocker Cattle Grazing Winter Wheat.

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
L R Thompson ◽  
M R Beck ◽  
G D Williams ◽  
S E Place ◽  
R Reuter
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-440
Author(s):  
L.R. Thompson ◽  
M.R. Beck ◽  
S.A. Gunter ◽  
G.D. Williams ◽  
S.E. Place ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Kynzie McNeill ◽  
Ryan R Reuter ◽  
Paul A Beck

Abstract A 72-d trial was conducted to estimate the combined effect of forage allowance and a fiber-based energy supplement in stocker cattle grazing wheat. Eight pastures (2.7 to 5.1 ha) each contained seven test steers (initial BW = 210 ± 36 kg). Weekly, additional steers were stocked in each pasture in a put and take method to achieve forage allowance of either 2.5 or 5.5 kg forage DM / kg steer BW (4 pastures each). Two pastures in each forage allowance were fed daily with a supplement containing 50% wheat midds and 50% soybean hulls at the rate of 1.5 kg per steer. Forage mass was measured twice weekly using a calibrated rising plate meter. Cattle were weighed weekly on calibrated scales. Data were analyzed using linear regression with pasture as the experimental unit. Mean ADG was 1.36 kg/d. One pasture in the high forage allowance, non-supplemented treatment was removed because we were unable to maintain the designed forage allowance. The interaction of forage allowance and supplement was not significant (P = 0.37) for ADG, and supplementation did not affect ADG (P = 0.20), however increased forage allowance tended to improve ADG (P = 0.06, 0.21 kg ADG per kg forage allowance). To further investigate forage DMI, a 14-d trial began on day 36. Three of the seven test steers in each pasture were randomly chosen and administered 7 ± 0.1 g of TiO2 daily at 0700 as an external marker to estimate fecal output. Forage DMI (at an assumed 72% DM digestibility) averaged 2.1% of midpoint BW, below our expectation. Additional forage allowance tended to improve estimated forage DMI (P= 0.06), but supplement had minimal effect (P = 0.30).


2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 36-36
Author(s):  
P A Gunter ◽  
R W Peacock ◽  
R B Muntifering ◽  
M K Mullenix

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
P. A. Gunter ◽  
R. W. Peacock ◽  
R. B. Muntifering ◽  
M. K. Mullenix

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Beck ◽  
D.S. Hubbell ◽  
K.B. Watkins ◽  
S.A. Gunter ◽  
L.B. Daniels

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Balkcom ◽  
D. W. Reeves ◽  
J. M. Kemble ◽  
R. A. Dawkins ◽  
R. L. Raper

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Kynzie McNeill ◽  
Ryan R Reuter ◽  
Paul A Beck

Abstract A 72-d trial was conducted to estimate the combined effect of forage allowance and a fiber-based energy supplement in stocker cattle grazing wheat. Eight pastures (2.7 to 5.1 ha) each contained seven test steers (initial BW = 210 ± 36 kg). Weekly, additional steers were stocked in each pasture in a put and take method to achieve forage allowance of either 2.5 or 5.5 kg forage DM / kg steer BW (4 pastures each). Two pastures in each forage allowance were fed daily with a supplement containing 50% wheat midds and 50% soybean hulls at the rate of 1.5 kg per steer. Forage mass was measured twice weekly using a calibrated rising plate meter. Cattle were weighed weekly on calibrated scales. Data were analyzed using linear regression with pasture as the experimental unit. Mean ADG was 1.36 kg/d. One pasture in the high forage allowance, non-supplemented treatment was removed because we were unable to maintain the designed forage allowance. The interaction of forage allowance and supplement was not significant (P = 0.37) for ADG, and supplementation did not affect ADG (P = 0.20), however increased forage allowance tended to improve ADG (P = 0.06, 0.21 kg ADG per kg forage allowance). To further investigate forage DMI, a 14-d trial began on day 36. Three of the seven test steers in each pasture were randomly chosen and administered 7 ± 0.1 g of TiO2 daily at 0700 as an external marker to estimate fecal output. Forage DMI (at an assumed 72% DM digestibility) averaged 2.1% of midpoint BW, below our expectation. Additional forage allowance tended to improve estimated forage DMI (P= 0.06), but supplement had minimal effect (P = 0.30).


1996 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nouhoun Coulibaly ◽  
Daniel J. Bernardo ◽  
Gerald W. Horn

AbstractEnergy supplementation provides a means of reducing production risk of growing stocker cattle on winter wheat pasture. This study addresses the issue of risk aversion and energy supplement input use. Differences in supplementation practices induced by risk aversion and the effects of cattle and feed market conditions are examined. Results show that supplementation practices are likely to be similar across producers, irrespective of their risk attitudes. Cattle and feed market conditions, however, markedly affect supplementation practices. These findings provide information for assisting stockmen in identifying efficient supplementation strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document