Treatment of the sexually/physically abused female inmate: Evaluation of an intensive short-term intervention program

1988 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faye Sultan ◽  
Gary Long
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 98-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annabel Zwönitzer ◽  
Ute Ziegenhain ◽  
Ina Bovenschen ◽  
Kristina Bressem ◽  
Melanie Pillhofer ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Wadsby ◽  
Gunilla Sydsjö ◽  
Carl Göran Svedin

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-190
Author(s):  
Subrina Jesmin ◽  
Farzana Sohael ◽  
Md. Arifur Rahman ◽  
Adil Maqbool ◽  
Md. Majedul Islam ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (10) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Katia Cristina Portero McLellan ◽  
Anna Lucia Vieira Bianchessi ◽  
Ana Elisa Rinaldi ◽  
Edilaine Michelin ◽  
Roberto Carlos Burini

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1181-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. W. Chan ◽  
H. C. So ◽  
C. L. M. Hui ◽  
W. C. Chang ◽  
E. H. M. Lee ◽  
...  

Background.Despite evidence on the short-term benefits of early intervention (EI) service for psychosis, long-term outcome studies are limited by inconsistent results. This study examined the 10-year outcomes of patients with first-episode psychosis who received 2-year territory-wide EI service compared to those who received standard care (SC) in Hong Kong using an historical control design.Method.Consecutive patients who received the EI service between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2002, and with diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, were identified and matched with patients who received SC first presented to the public psychiatric service from 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001. In total, 148 matched pairs of patients were identified. Cross-sectional information on symptomatology and functioning was obtained through semi-structured interview; longitudinal information on hospitalization, functioning, suicide attempts, mortality and relapse over 10 years was obtained from clinical database. There were 70.3% (N = 104) of SC and 74.3% (N = 110) of EI patients interviewed.Results.Results suggested that EI patients had reduced suicide rate (χ2(1) = 4.35, p = 0.037), fewer number [odds ratio (OR) 1.56, χ2 = 15.64, p < 0.0001] and shorter duration of hospitalization (OR 1.29, χ2 = 4.06, p = 0.04), longer employment periods (OR −0.28, χ2 = 14.64, p < 0.0001) and fewer suicide attempts (χ2 = 11.47, df = 1, p = 0.001) over 10 years. At 10 years, no difference was found in psychotic symptoms, symptomatic remission and functional recovery.Conclusions.The short-term benefits of the EI service on number of hospitalizations and employment was sustained after service termination, but the differences narrowed down. This suggests the need to evaluate the optimal duration of the EI service.


1982 ◽  
Vol 55 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1332-1334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith B. Amster ◽  
Philip J. Lazarus

Normative data were collected on 197 disadvantaged high school dropouts on the dimension of internal-external control. Findings indicate that this group appears to be external but not markedly so, and a short-term intervention program designed to improve academic and vocational skills did not appear to affect locus of control of 33 subjects.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
M. Valenta ◽  
Ch. Krahulcova ◽  
I. Listiakova

This paper introduces the means of dramatherapy intervention at two sites - at the Centre for secondary prevention and treatment of addictions Military Hospital in Olomouc and Toxicological rehabilitation department 17B (community Mandala) Psychiatric Hospital in Kroměříž. The first workplace has a detoxifying and short-term intervention program (month), while the Mandala is implemented medium-term dramatherapy program (up to a half-year). The second part gives the results of the investigation, which was focused on finding differences (relations) between the client and the perception of the benefits of the concept dramatherapy intervention at the aforementioned sites - nvestigation did not show differences between evaluation intervention customers of both institutions.


Author(s):  
Benoit Pairot de Fontenay ◽  
Joachim van Cant ◽  
Alli Gokeler ◽  
Jean-Sebastien Roy

ABSTRACT Context: Return to running (RTR) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is a crucial milestone. However, there is uncertainty on how and when to start a running program. Objective: To explore the feasibility of a structured program to reintroduce running after ACL-R and to evaluate the predictive value of potential predictors of short-term success. Design: Longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Local Research Center / participant's home. Patients: Thirty-five participants were recruited after ACL-R. Intervention: Program with a progression algorithm to reintroduce running (10 running sessions in 14 days). Main outcome measures: The criterion for short-term success was no exacerbation of symptoms. Potential predictors included: (i) the International Knee Document Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form; (ii) ACL Return to Sport after Injury questionnaire; (iii) quadriceps and hamstring strength; (iv) Step-Down Endurance test; and (v) the modified Star Excursion Balance test. Descriptive statistics were performed to study the feasibility of the RTR program and Poisson regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of success. Results: Of the 34 participants included, 33 completed the RTR program. Sixteen participants experienced some temporary exacerbation of symptoms, but only one had to stop the RTR program. Initial IKDC score was the only significant predictor of a successful RTR with an Area under the ROC curve of 80.4%. An ICKD cut-off of 63.7/100 differentiated responders and non-responders with the highest sensitivity and specificity (77.8% and 75.0%, respectively). There was a 3-fold greater chance of success with an IKDC score above this threshold. Conclusions: Our results confirm the feasibility of our RTR program and progression algorithm after ACL-R. Clinicians should use an IKDC score of &gt;64 as a criterion to reintroduce running after ACL-R to increase the likelihood of short-term success.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document