Consumer, health professional and employment specialist experiences of an individual placement and support programme

Author(s):  
Suzanne Dawson ◽  
Jessica Muller ◽  
Vic Renigers ◽  
Lisa Varona ◽  
Jocelyn Kernot
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne Miller ◽  
Suzanne Clinton-Davis ◽  
Tina Meegan

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide the personal accounts of the journey back to work from the perspective of both the person entering employment and the Employment Specialist who assisted them. Design/methodology/approach – Two people with mental health problems who received help into employment from an employment service in a London Mental Health Trust were asked to give write their accounts of their journey. The Employment Specialists who assisted them in this journey were also asked to write their accounts. Findings – Reflective accounts – no findings presented. Originality/value – Much has been written about the effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support evidence-based supported employment, but little has been published about the lived experience of this approach from the perspective of both the person endeavouring to return to work and the employment specialists who support them. This paper presents two such accounts.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonje Fyhn ◽  
Kari Ludvigsen ◽  
Silje E Reme ◽  
Frederieke Schaafsma

Abstract Background The effect of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) has been widely documented, but in many studies, the majority of participants remains unemployed. Structured process evaluations that use mixed methods are scarce, although they could identify components that may enhance the effect of IPS. The aim of the current study is to provide a description of a structured mixed methods process evaluation of IPS in Norway. Methods The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial including six IPS centers, comparing IPS with treatment as usual in a population of patients in treatment for moderate to severe mental illness. Mixed methods were used in the process evaluation, and outcome measures were reach, barriers and facilitators, and fidelity. Results The intervention reached the intended target group. All centers reached fair to good fidelity within the project period. Certain fidelity items seemed to indicate implementation issues related to employer contact, community-based services, and integration with health services. Less than half of the participants regarded their illness as a barrier for participation in IPS. Participants were overall satisfied and found the intervention useful, emphasizing the availability of the employment specialist and their consistent job focus, as well as the freedom to disclose their illness or not. Conclusions Certain fidelity items indicated implementation issues during the first year, namely providing community-based services, ensuring quality in employer contact, and integration with health treatment. The employment specialist clearly played an important role for participants. Most participants described this relationship as positive, empowering, and encouraging. Trial Registration The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov prior to the inclusion period (reg.no: NCT01964092, registered 17/07/2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01964092 ).


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathrine Moe ◽  
Beate Brinchmann ◽  
Line Rasmussen ◽  
Oda Lekve Brandseth ◽  
David McDaid ◽  
...  

Abstract Background For decades there has been a continuous increase in the number of people receiving welfare benefits for being outside the work force due to mental illness. There is sufficient evidence for the efficacy of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) for gaining and maintaining competitive employment. Yet, IPS is still not implemented as routine practice in public community mental health services. Knowledge about implementation challenges as experienced by the practitioners is limited. This study seeks to explore the experiences of the front-line workers, known as employment specialists, in the early implementation phase. Methods Qualitative data were collected through field notes and five focus group interviews. The study participants were 45 IPS employment specialists located at 14 different sites in Northern Norway. Transcripts and field notes were analysed by thematic analyses. Results While employment specialists are key to the implementation process, implementing IPS requires more than creating and filling the role of the employment specialist. It requires adjustments in multiple organisations. The new employment specialist then is a pioneer of service development. Some employment specialists found this a difficult challenge, and one that did not correspond to their expectations going into this role. Others appreciated the pioneering role. IPS implementation also challenged the delegation of roles and responsibilities between sectors, and related legal frameworks related to confidentiality and access. The facilitating role of human relationships emphasised the importance of social support which is an important factor in a healthy work environment. Rural areas with long distances and close- knit societies may cause challenges for implementation. Conclusion The study provides increased understanding on what happens in the early implementation phase of IPS from the employment specialists’ perspective. Results from this study can contribute to increased focus on job satisfaction, turnover and recruitment of employment specialists, factors which have previously been shown to influence the success of IPS. The greatest challenge for making “IPS efficacy in trials” become “IPS effectiveness in the real world” is implementation, and this study has highlighted some of the implementation issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document