scholarly journals ‘REGIONAL’ INEQUALITY IN CHINA AND THE EU: SPATIAL SCALE, DEVELOPMENT TRAJECTORIES AND POLICY LEARNING

2013 ◽  
Vol 289 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Dabinett ◽  
Alasdair Rae
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guri Bang ◽  
David G. Victor ◽  
Steinar Andresen

This article investigates the roles of policy diffusion and policy learning in shaping the design of California’s cap-and-trade system. On the surface, it is very similar to other cap-and-trade programs, but in practice many detailed differences reflect active efforts by California policy-makers to avoid flaws that they saw in other systems, such as the EU ETS and the US East Coast’s Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. We assess how California’s cap-and-trade system emerged, the significance of policy diffusion, and the lessons for other trading systems by applying two broad sets of theoretical frames—the role of policy diffusion and the role of organized local political concerns. We find that despite the signature status of the trading system, California mostly relies on much less transparent and more costly direct regulation. We also find that California’s cap-and-trade system has developed mostly in its own, special political context, which hampers the feasibility of cross-border trading.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina Lange ◽  
Nafsika Alexiadou

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 895-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Dunford ◽  
Diane Perrons
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Krista Loogma

The EU represents a transforming educational space, where national and supranational boundaries in educational governance are becoming blurred. The EU has become an important actor in educational governance and an important arena for policy learning and transfer. This paper explores how the process of reshaping the educational space manifests itself in the process of the Europeanization of VET policy in the case of Estonia. In Estonia, this process was followed by the growth of executive VET institutions and has developed from rather uncritical initial policy transfer to more active learning from the EU, although conformism can still be seen in cases of the introduction of standardizing policy tools.


Author(s):  
Mark Dawson

This chapter explores the place of new modes of governance among the EU’s legal acts ‘after’ the onset of the sovereign debt and euro crises. While the last decade has seen a period of supposed decline in such instruments, the chapter argues that the euro crisis has returned an altered form of new governance to prominence as a way of managing complex, multilevel problems that traditional regulation cannot easily solve. The empirical drift back to new governance instruments is also examined normatively. Analysing the development of the European Semester, the chapter questions the suitability of new governance instruments to the harmonizing tasks to which they are currently being put. By abandoning the earlier focus of new governance on experimental policy learning between states, the EU may also be abandoning the most promising impact of new governance instruments on the EU’s legal architecture.


Subject New UK economic direction. Significance The rhetoric of the new government implies a radical break with previous policy both domestically (tackling regional inequality) and internationally (the freedom to diverge from EU rules). In both cases the ambitions are real and there will be major changes, but significant economic and political tensions remain and have yet to be resolved: public spending demands may not be met due to fiscal and political constraints while London's aim for economic divergence will face opposition from business. Impacts The respective red lines of the United Kingdom and EU mean that a thin trade deal, or possibly none at all, is the most likely outcome. Large increases in infrastructure spending are unlikely to alleviate regional inequalities in the short term. Economic divergence from the EU will limit the scope for a close and comprehensive EU-UK security and defence relationship post-Brexit.


2021 ◽  
pp. 219-240
Author(s):  
Alexander Bürgin

AbstractBased on a review of the relations between the European Commission (EC) and Turkey across a selection of policy areas, this chapter illustrates two aspects of EC influence in EU–Turkey relations. First, as a defender of the rules of the (enlargement) game, the Commission has rebuffed attempts by some member states to undermine Turkey’s membership prospects. The EC’s influence in the debate on the most appropriate approach to Turkey underlines its autonomous role within the EU system and the relevance of its norm-based argumentation. However, due to Turkey’s current alienation from the EU’s normative standards, norm-based arguments in favor of Turkey’s membership have lost much of their weight even within the Commission. Second, the EC has been an important ‘agent of change’ in Turkish domestic politics, even in times of deteriorating political relations with the EU. Because of its contributions to regular interactions, in particular, in the framework of projects financed by the EU’s Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, the EC has continued to increase administrative capacity and policy learning processes within Turkey’s bureaucracy, which, in turn, contributed to Ankara’s continued harmonization with the EU acquis in some sectors, despite the waning relevance of the EU’s conditionality strategy.


Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 846
Author(s):  
Francesca L. Falco ◽  
Eran Feitelson ◽  
Tamar Dayan

Agriculture is a major driver of the ongoing biodiversity decline, demanding an urgent transition towards a system that reconciles productivity and profitability with nature conservation; however, where public policies promote such transitions are in place, their design often poorly fits the relevant biogeophysical systems, decreasing the policies’ expected effectiveness. Spatial scale mismatches are a primary example in this regard. The literature reviewed in this paper, drawing from both ecology and policy studies, suggests to foster policy implementation at the landscape scale, where most functional ecological processes—and the delivery of related ecosystem services—occur on farmland. Two strategies are identified for coordinating policy implementation at the landscape scale: the promotion of farmers’ collective action and the partition of space on an ecologically sound basis through spatial planning. As the new European Union Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post-2023 is currently being defined, we assess if and how the draft agri-biodiversity legislation includes any of the strategies above. We find no comprehensive uptake of the landscape-scale perspective at the EU level, thereby suggesting that a powerful tool to overcome the CAP underperformance on biodiversity is being overlooked.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document