scholarly journals Range of motion (ROM) in the lips and jaw during vowels assessed with 3D motion analysis in Swedish children with typical speech development and children with speech sound disorders

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Åsa Mogren ◽  
Anita McAllister ◽  
Lotta Sjögreen
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Speech Development ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
3D Motion ◽  
3D Motion Analysis

scholarly journals Minimal detectable difference of the finger and wrist range of motion: comparison of goniometry and 3D motion analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Reissner ◽  
Gabriella Fischer ◽  
Renate List ◽  
William R. Taylor ◽  
Pietro Giovanoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
3D Motion ◽  
3D Motion Analysis ◽  
Detectable Difference

scholarly journals Hip joint range of motion is restricted by pain rather than mechanical impingement in individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefine E. Naili ◽  
Anders Stålman ◽  
Anders Valentin ◽  
Mikael Skorpil ◽  
Lars Weidenhielm
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Motion Simulation ◽  
3D Motion ◽  
3D Motion Analysis ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Hip Rotation ◽  
Linear Regressions

Abstract Introduction Discerning whether range of motion (ROM) is restricted by morphology or other pain sources is challenging in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Computed tomography (CT) motion simulation provides a hypothetical ROM based on morphology. This study aimed to explore associations between ROM measured using CT motion simulation and maximum passive ROM measured clinically using three dimensional (3D) motion analysis in patients with FAIS, prior to and post arthroscopic hip surgery. Materials and methods Eight males with FAIS (in total 12 hip joints) were included in this explorative feasibility study. Participants were examined using CT according to a low-dose protocol prior to and 7-months post arthroscopic surgery. Software was used to simulate at which ROM the impingement would occur. With the hip in 90 degrees’ flexion, maximum passive range of internal hip rotation, and maximum passive internal hip rotation coupled with adduction was examined clinically using 3D motion analysis pre- and postoperatively. Spearman rank correlation coefficients and linear regressions examined associations between methods. Results Preoperatively, the correlation between maximum internal hip rotation measured using CT motion simulation and 3D motion analysis was strong (r = 0.71, p = 0.009). Linear regressions demonstrated that maximal internal rotation measured using CT motion simulation was predominantly larger than when measured using 3D motion analysis. Postoperatively, and when maximum internal rotation was coupled with adduction, no correlations were found between the two methods. Conclusions The hypothetical morphology restricted ROM is larger than clinically assessed pain restricted ROM, both prior to and post hip arthroscopy. These findings suggest that ROM is restricted by pain rather than mechanical, morphology-based impingement in individuals with FAIS.

scholarly journals The change of gait analysis on applying metatarsal-bar used 3D motion analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Se won Yoon ◽  
Jeong woo Lee ◽  
Soo ji Park ◽  
Woong sik Park ◽  
Moon jeong Kim
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
3D Motion ◽  
3D Motion Analysis

Integrated 3D motion analysis with functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging to identify neural correlates of lower extremity movement

2021 ◽  
Vol 355 ◽  
pp. 109108
Author(s):  
Manish Anand ◽  
Jed A. Diekfuss ◽  
Alexis B. Slutsky-Ganesh ◽  
Dustin R. Grooms ◽  
Scott Bonnette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Functional Magnetic Resonance ◽  
3D Motion ◽  
3D Motion Analysis

scholarly journals Supporting Children With Speech Sound Disorders During COVID-19 Restrictions: Technological Solutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1805-1808
Author(s):  
Sharynne McLeod ◽  
Kirrie J. Ballard ◽  
Beena Ahmed ◽  
Nicole McGill ◽  
Michelle I. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
School Achievement ◽  
Speech Sound ◽  
Waiting Lists ◽  
Speech Development ◽  
Speech Pathology ◽  
Speech Sound Disorders ◽  
Language Pathology ◽  
Speech Intervention ◽  
The Impact

Purpose “Children are the hidden victims of the COVID-19 pandemic” (United Nations Children's Fund, 2020). Timely and effective speech intervention is important to reduce the impact on children's school achievement, ability to make friends, mental health, future life opportunities, and government resources. Prior to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, many Australian children did not receive sufficient speech-language pathology (SLP) services due to long waiting lists in the public health system. COVID-19 restrictions exacerbated this issue, as even children who were at the top of lengthy SLP waiting lists often received limited services, particularly in rural areas. To facilitate children receiving speech intervention remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding three technological solutions are examined: (a) Phoneme Factory Sound Sorter (Sound Start Study), (b) Waiting for Speech Pathology website, and (c) Apraxia World. Conclusions For the first two technological solutions, there were similar gains in speech production between the intervention and control groups, whereas, for the third solution, the average magnitude of treatment effect was comparable to face-to-face SLP therapy. Automated therapy management systems may be able to accelerate speech development and support communication resilience to counteract the effects of the COVID-19 restrictions on children with speech sound disorders. Technology-based strategies may also provide a potential solution to the chronic shortage of SLP services in rural areas into the future.

scholarly journals Comparison of Two Methods to Estimate the Maximal Velocity of a Ball during an Overhand Throw

Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Alanna Weisberg ◽  
Julie Le Gall ◽  
Pro Stergiou ◽  
Larry Katz
Keyword(s):  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Doppler Radar ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Maximal Velocity ◽  
3D Motion ◽  
3D Motion Analysis ◽  
Ball Velocity ◽  
Significant Performance ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

Maximal ball velocity is a significant performance indicator in many sports, such as baseball. Doppler radar guns are widely assumed to underestimate velocity. Accuracy increases as the cosine angle between the radar gun and the object decreases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of player handedness and the location of the radar gun on the accuracy of ball velocity. Throws were analyzed in four conditions: the radar gun on the right side, throwing with the right arm, then with the left arm; and the radar gun on the left side, throwing with the right arm, then with the left arm. The Cronbach’s alpha for all four conditions showed α-values above 0.97; however, a paired t-test indicated significant differences between the 3D motion analysis and the radar gun. Bland–Altman plots show a high degree of scatter in all conditions. Results suggest that the radar gun measurements can be highly inconsistent when compared to 3D motion analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document