Assessment of a film-cooling flow structure by large-eddy simulation

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. N29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Ziefle ◽  
Leonhard Kleiser
Author(s):  
Rui Hou ◽  
Fengbo Wen ◽  
Yuxi Luo ◽  
Xiaolei Tang ◽  
Songtao Wang

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Ziefle ◽  
Leonhard Kleiser

Numerical simulation results using large-eddy simulation of a flow configuration relevant to the film cooling of turbine blades are presented. The flow configuration and the simulation parameters are chosen according to an experiment from literature, in which a hot turbulent crossflow over a flat plate is cooled by fluid issuing from a large isobaric plenum through a short inclined circular nozzle. Special attention is paid to the flow structure within the jet nozzle and the mixing region, as well as to the effect of the crossflow fluctuations thereon. To this end, the numerical results with the turbulent crossflow are compared to our previous data obtained with a steady mean-turbulent inflow profile. While the flow inside the nozzle is very similar for the two cases, large differences occur in the mixing region, where a much enhanced spreading of the coolant is observed with the turbulent crossflow. Consequently, the good agreement of the film-cooling efficiencies with the experimental data for the turbulent-crossflow case is contrasted by large deviations with the stationary inflow due to the lack of crossflow fluctuations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 855-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhua Wang ◽  
Jingzhou Zhang ◽  
Hongke Feng ◽  
Ying Huang

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 238-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhua Wang ◽  
Fangsu Fan ◽  
Jingzhou Zhang ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Hongke Feng

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (0) ◽  
pp. _J051021-1-_J051021-4
Author(s):  
Eiji SAKAI ◽  
Toshihiko TAKAHASHI ◽  
Hiroaki WATANABE

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Seung Il Baek ◽  
Joon Ahn

A large eddy simulation (LES) was performed for film cooling in the gas turbine blade involving spanwise injection angles (orientation angles). For a streamwise coolant injection angle (inclination angle) of 35°, the effects of the orientation angle were compared considering a simple angle of 0° and 30°. Two ratios of the coolant to main flow mass flux (blowing ratio) of 0.5 and 1.0 were considered and the experimental conditions of Jung and Lee (2000) were adopted for the geometry and flow conditions. Moreover, a Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes simulation (RANS) was performed to understand the characteristics of the turbulence models compared to those in the LES and experiments. In the RANS, three turbulence models were compared, namely, the realizable k-ε, k-ω shear stress transport, and Reynolds stress models. The temperature field and flow fields predicted through the RANS were similar to those obtained through the experiment and LES. Nevertheless, at a simple angle, the point at which the counter-rotating vortex pair (CRVP) collided on the wall and rose was different from that in the experiment and LES. Under the compound angle, the point at which the CRVP changed to a single vortex was different from that in the LES. The adiabatic film cooling effectiveness could not be accurately determined through the RANS but was well reflected by the LES, even under the compound angle. The reattachment of the injectant at a blowing ratio of 1.0 was better predicted by the RANS at the compound angle than at the simple angle. The temperature fluctuation was predicted to decrease slightly when the injectant was supplied at a compound angle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document