Public sector reform and public management theory ―cases of Japan

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Ishihara
2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Norman

The New Zealand public management model is a product of 1980s and 1990s enthusiasm for replacing hierarchy and centralised bureaucracies with contracts and market-like methods for delivering public services. Fervour for change from tradition is illustrated by the titles of these books published in 1992, a high-water mark for public sector reform in New Zealand: Liberation Management (Peters, 1992), Reinventing Government (Osborne and Gaebler, 1992) and Breaking through Bureaucracy (Barzelay, 1992).


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-618
Author(s):  
Lhawang Ugyel ◽  
Carsten Daugbjerg

The scope and intensity of policy transfer has increased in recent years as developing countries have drawn on public sector reform programmes based on new public management practices originally designed in western democracies. However, there is mounting evidence that to be successful, reform programmes must be adapted to local contexts. This article demonstrates that national government control of policy transfer can enable localisation which in turn enhances the effectiveness of public reforms. Analysis of the Position Classification System ‐ which sought to enhance accountability, efficiency and professionalism in the civil service in Bhutan ‐ highlights two conditions that enable domestic control of the policy transfer process: strong internal motivation for engaging in policy transfer and the establishment or adaptation of institutions to manage processes of policy transfer. We conclude that when these conditions apply, a developing country can engage in successful voluntary policy transfer and retain control of the process.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hughes ◽  
James Smart

Over the past 30 years New Zealand’s system of public management has seen a number of positive changes, both systematic and incremental. That process made New Zealand a world leader in public management. Despite this, it remains difficult to gain traction on some of the most complex problems in society. Further, citizens have begun to demand more from their public service than just outputs and efficiency. In order to continue the positive trend of the previous decades, the system must evolve to appreciate the importance of outcomes and effectiveness. 


Author(s):  
Jenny M. Lewis

Innovation has become an increasingly important public policy and public sector reform trend in Australia and in other nations as governments search for new ways to tackle challenging societal problems. Innovation follows on from other reform trends that have been argued about, implemented, and constantly updated (most notably the New Public Management) since the 1970s, but also has distinct attributes. This chapter examines the meaning of public sector innovation and explores how it differs to other approaches to public sector reform. It describes Australian innovation policy at the national level and examines two main varieties of it: innovation as technology, and innovation as culture. Australia’s approach to innovation policy has sometimes focused on individuals (public servants), and at other times on public sector organizations and systems. Innovation labs/units, as one aspect of Australian public sector innovation policy, demonstrate Australia’s general alignment with international trends in this area of public policy.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-36
Author(s):  
Jaewan Bahk

This paper reviews the motivations, visions and strategies of the Kim Dae-Jung Administration’s public sector reform initiative, identifies promising features and problems, and brings up future tasks. A framework of analysis is set up based on systems analysis and change management. The initiative’s visions are largely successful in terms of setting up an infrastructure of structural reforms and institutionalizing the initiative as they properly focus on value-for-money and democracy. However, the new initiative pays relatively less attention to procedural democracy, an essential element to remedy the lop-sided operation of the Korean government. In accordance with five checkpoints suggested by the framework of analysis, the new initiative’s strategies are examined. Key features of the strategies are the followings: ( i ) tough leadership backed up by powerful driving agencies; ( ii ) top-down approaches; ( iii ) comprehensive scope with scattered safe harbors; ( iv ) conflicts and distortions from myopic perspectives and political motives; and ( v ) higher intensity and faster pace in compelled uniformity. Corresponding to these features, we suggested several tasks to be addressed. Among other things, a bottom-up approach and a clean up of the political context prior to or at least simultaneously with the new public management drive are indispensable for a successful reform.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document