Cognitive errors, coping patterns, and the therapeutic alliance: A pilot study of in-session process

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D'iuso ◽  
E. Blake ◽  
M. Fitzpatrick ◽  
M. Drapeau
2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. SMOUT ◽  
P.J. KOUDSTAAL ◽  
G.M. RIBBERS ◽  
W.G.M. JANSSEN ◽  
J. PASSCHIER

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Liz M. Williams ◽  
Jacinta M. Douglas

Abstract Objective: A positive therapeutic (or working) alliance has been associated with better outcomes for clients in the psychotherapeutic and traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation literature. The aim of this pilot study was to gain an understanding of the therapeutic alliance in community rehabilitation from the perspectives of adults with TBI and their close others who have completed a community rehabilitation programme. Method: This study used a constructivist, qualitative methodology which applied grounded theory analysis techniques. Using purposeful sampling, three pairs of participants (adults with TBI and close others) who had finished a community rehabilitation programme completed separate in-depth interviews which were transcribed verbatim and progressively analysed using a process of constant comparison. Results: A preliminary framework illustrating participants’ experience of a therapeutic alliance was generated, comprising three interconnected themes: being recognised as an individual, working together and feeling personally connected. All participants viewed being able to work together as important in their experience of community rehabilitation and described features that helped and hindered the alliance. Conclusion: These pilot study results demonstrate the importance of the therapeutic alliance to the rehabilitation experience of individuals with TBI and those close to them.


2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.P. Stiegler ◽  
J.P. Neelankavil ◽  
C. Canales ◽  
A. Dhillon

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivesh Prakash ◽  
Shailesh Bihari ◽  
Penelope Need ◽  
Cyle Sprick ◽  
Lambert Schuwirth

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Gasper Jacques ◽  
Cass Dykeman

This study was designed to examine the therapeutic alliance and specific rupture types that counselors experience in a counseling session by employing a cross sectional analysis of a linguistic corpus created from transcriptions of mock counseling sessions. A corpus linguistic program called #Lancsbox 6.0 was used to analyze the collocates of the top words found in therapeutic rupture types. Results of this study show that the word “just,” which was often used as part of a less direct filler expression, was the most frequent word in the confrontation rupture corpus as well as a top five word in the withdrawal and mixed rupture corpuses. Regarding the withdrawal rupture corpus, the node word “know,” a cognitive-oriented token that could create emotional distance, had four high intensity words (collocates), two of which (“I” and “you”) were shared with a confrontation type corpus. Regarding the mixed rupture corpus, the most common word “like” was often used as a preposition and was implicated in low empathy encounters and did not appear as a collocation in the confrontation or withdrawal rupture collocation analysis. Implications for both counseling and research are discussed.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Schwartzman ◽  
Ulrich Kramer ◽  
Martin Drapeau

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document