Is vaginal delivery of a breech second twin safe? A comparison between delivery of vertex and non-vertex second twins

Author(s):  
Ronnie Cohen ◽  
Lior Kashani Ligumsky ◽  
Miriam Lopian ◽  
Rachel Maiberg ◽  
Avshalom Elmalech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e046616
Author(s):  
Rokuhiro Asahina ◽  
Hiroyuki Tsuda ◽  
Yuki Nishiko ◽  
Kazuya Fuma ◽  
Momoko Kuribayashi ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the success rate of vaginal delivery, the reasons for unplanned caesarean delivery, the rate of umbilical cord prolapse and the risk of umbilical cord prolapse in twin deliveries.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingSingle institution.ParticipantsThis study included 455 women pregnant with twins (307 dichorionic and 148 monochorionic) who attempted vaginal delivery from January 2009 to August 2018. The following criteria were considered for vaginal delivery: diamniotic twins, cephalic presentation of the first twin, no history of uterine scar, no other indications for caesarean delivery, no major structural abnormality in either twin and no fetal aneuploidy.ResultsThe rate of vaginal delivery of both twins was 89.5% (407 of 455), caesarean delivery of both twins was 7.7% (35 of 455) and caesarean delivery of only the second twin was 2.9% (13 of 455). The major reasons for unplanned caesarean delivery were arrest of labour and non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern. The rate of umbilical cord prolapse in the second twin was 1.8% (8 of 455). Multivariate analysis revealed that abnormal umbilical cord insertion in the second twin (velamentous or marginal) was the only significant factor for umbilical cord prolapse in the second twin (OR, 5.05, 95% CI 1.139 to 22.472, p=0.033).ConclusionsAbnormal umbilical cord insertion in the second twin (velamentous or marginal) was a significant factor for umbilical cord prolapse during delivery. Antenatal assessment of the second twin’s umbilical cord insertion using ultrasonography would be beneficial.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgit Arabin ◽  
Ioannis Kyvernitakis ◽  
Amr Hamza ◽  
Hoilger Maul ◽  
Mariarosaria Di Tommaso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1033-1040
Author(s):  
Anne Dathan-Stumpf ◽  
Katharina Winkel ◽  
Holger Stepan

Abstract Objective The appropriate delivery mode for twins is discussed controversially in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate delivery modes and short-term neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies delivered in University Hospital Leipzig. Material and Methods A total of 274 twin pregnancies (32.0 to 39.4 weeks of gestation) delivered between 2015 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively with regard to the planned and final delivery mode as well as neonatal outcomes. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for vaginal delivery were comparable to those of the Twin Birth Study. Results The spontaneous birth rate for births planned as vaginal deliveries was 78.5%; the rate of secondary cesarean section was 19.4%. The final total cesarean rate was 58.8%, and the rate of vaginal deliveries was 41.2%. Vertex or non-vertex position of the second twin had no significant effect on neonatal outcome or mean delivery interval between the birth of the first and second twin. Chorionicity, neonatal weight and gender had no significant impact on delivery mode. However, successful vaginal delivery was associated with higher gestational age and both fetuses in vertex position. The combined neonatal outcome for both twins was significantly worse if they were delivered by cesarean section compared to spontaneous birth. In addition, the leading twin in monochorionic/diamniotic (MC/DA) pregnancies was intubated more frequently after cesarean delivery and had significantly lower Apgar scores. Conclusion Vaginal delivery in twin pregnancies is a practicable and safe option in specific defined conditions and when the appropriate infrastructure and clinical experience is available.


Author(s):  
Sabine Enengl ◽  
Peter Oppelt ◽  
Simon-Hermann Enzelsberger ◽  
Philip Sebastian Trautner ◽  
Omar Shebl ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Numbers of planned cesarean deliveries are increasing in twin pregnancies, despite the lack of evidence for this approach, and the second twin is thought to be at risk for a poorer outcome. The aim of this study was to examine whether twins have a poorer outcome if an attempted vaginal delivery is changed to a cesarean section or combined delivery. Methods This retrospective data analysis included all women with dichorionic twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery over a 10-year period. Outcome parameters for the first and second twins relative to their mode of birth were compared. A correlation model between the interdelivery time interval and Apgar scores was calculated. Subgroup analyses assessing the birth mode of the first and second twins were conducted. Results A total of 248 women were enrolled in the study. The second twins had significantly lower values for outcome parameters, such as umbilical artery cord pH and Apgar scores in comparison with the first twins (P < 0.01). The subgroup analysis of birth modes in first and second twins showed a significantly poorer outcome in the cesarean section and combined delivery group (P < 0.05). The interdelivery time interval was significantly longer in the second twin cesarean section group (P < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between the interdelivery time intervals and Apgar scores (P > 0.05). Conclusion Although outcome parameters were significantly lower in second twins and twins born via secondary cesarean section, the clinical relevance of this appears to be negligible.


1986 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 936-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawan K. Rattan ◽  
Robert A. Knuppel ◽  
William F. O'Brien ◽  
Jose C. Scerbo

1993 ◽  
Vol 168 (3) ◽  
pp. 861-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Fishman ◽  
Debra K. Grubb ◽  
Bruce W. Kovacs
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zavery Benela ◽  
Alfred Chibwae ◽  
Ola Jahanpour ◽  
Dismas Matovelo

Abstract Background The perinatal mortality rates are five times higher in twin pregnancies than singleton pregnancies, therefore antenatal management and safe delivery of twin pregnancies are important issues in obstetrics. This study aimed at providing data on the proportion of twin deliveries in four public hospitals in Dar es Salaam and an insight on the fetal outcomes in relation to their modes of delivery. Methods This was a cross sectional study in which all women who delivered twin babies were interviewed and medical records on their delivery summary were obtained in the labour and post-natal wards in four public hospitals in Dar es Salaam between July and December 2011. Post-natal follow up was done on seventh day by contacting women by telephone to establish the neonatal status. Results There were 33,638 total deliveries of which 672 were twin deliveries making the prevalence of 2.0% (20 per 1,000 births). Of all twin deliveries analyzed (666 pairs), 373(56.0%) had the diagnosis of twin pregnancy made antenatally. Vaginal delivery was the major mode of delivery (77.3%). whereas combined delivery in which the first twin was delivered vaginally and the second twin by caesarian section accounted for only 2.6%. At birth 1252(94%) of twins were alive, 60(4.5%), were fresh stillbirths and 20(1.5%) were macerated stillbirths. Low Apgar score was more to first twins delivered vaginally compared to first twins (p-value=0.003). Low Apgar score (AS <7) was more amongst second twins delivered vaginally at 30 minutes or longer 27(48.2%) compared to twins delivered in less than 30 minutes 72(15.4%), (p-value=0.001). Conclusion There was a significant association between vaginal delivery and low Apgar score at one minute. Long duration of twin to twin delivery interval was associated with low Apgar score of the second twins delivered vaginally. Perinatal mortality rate was also higher in the second twins compared to the first twins. The time delivery interval of the second twin should be made as short as possible by active management of all second twins. Neonatal facilities are required in all hospitals conducting twin deliveries to care for premature babies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document