An Ethical Evaluation of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for HIV Testing in Health Care Settings

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Teresa Celada ◽  
Roland C. Merchant ◽  
Michael J. Waxman ◽  
Angela M. Sherwin
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Schouten

Upon completion of this chapter, the reader should be able to • Demonstrate knowledge about legal issues surrounding HIV health care and to interact more effectively, professionally, and sensitively with patients and their families. Discuss the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recommendations for routine HIV testing in various health care settings....


2021 ◽  
pp. 101053952110147
Author(s):  
Yaena Song ◽  
Linda Ko ◽  
Sou Hyun Jang

This study aimed to examine the types of misinformation spreading in South Korea during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic by exploring the fact-checking posts uploaded on the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) website. We conducted a content analysis of the posts written on the KCDC website titled, “COVID-19: Fact and Issue Check,” from February to August 2020 (n = 81). Two coders individually coded the posts using a codebook. Discrepancies in coding were discussed to reach reconciliation. Fifteen different Korean government agencies used the KCDC platform to refute various topics of COVID-19 misinformation, including policy (42.0%), how to prevent the spread (16.0%), health care professionals (12.3%), testing (11.1%), prevention (self-care) (9.9%), masks (8.6%), confirmed cases (8.6%), statistics (3.7%), self-quarantine (2.5%), and treatment (1.2%). We found that there are more dissemination and correction of nonmedical areas of COVID-19 misinformation than medical areas in Korea. Future studies need to examine to what extent the corrected COVID-19 misinformation has been disseminated on different social media platforms, beyond the KCDC website.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document