Partisan Schemata in Biased Interpretation of Electoral Proposals and Political Candidate Evaluation

Two experiments demonstrate that highly empathetic messages conveyed by a political candidate produce more favorable attitudes and increase the likelihood individuals will vote for the political candidate. Study 1 revealed this Empathetic Communication Effect is stronger among female political candidates than male. Compared to male candidates, female candidates are evaluated more positively when they engage in empathetic language but are more harshly penalized when they fail to display empathy. An analogous pattern emerged for candidate party in Study 2. Namely, the Empathetic Communication Effect is stronger among Democratic political candidates than Republican political candidates. Results also explore the impact of empathetic rhetoric on perceptions of candidates’ socio-emotionality and instrumentality.

Download Full-text

Captatio Benevolentiae: Potential Risks and Benefits of Flattering the Audience in a Public Political Speech

Journal of Language and Social Psychology ◽

10.1177/0261927x18800132 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 37 (6) ◽

pp. 706-720

Author(s):

Nicoletta Cavazza ◽

Margherita Guidetti

Keyword(s):

Interpersonal Communication ◽

Impression Management ◽

Candidate Evaluation ◽

Social Category ◽

Public Speech ◽

Risks And Benefits ◽

Political Candidate ◽

The Social ◽

Potential Risks ◽

Practical Implications

Given that flattery is a form of impression management and a persuasive tool in interpersonal communication, two experiments investigated the effect of a (fictitious) political candidate praising the audience during a meeting. The flattery was addressed to the social category to which participants belong (direct flattery condition) or to another social category (observed flattery condition). The flattering message (vs. control condition) employed in the context of a public speech induced a more positive candidate evaluation on both the members of the flattered audience and the observers. The effect was not mediated by degree of message scrutiny, nor by suspicion of source ulterior motives, and it was not moderated by the level of identification with the audience. This suggests that the compliment to the audience leads the members of the flattered category to reciprocate liking and the observers to transfer the source’s attitude recursively (TAR effect). Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Download Full-text

The Effects of Satire: Exploring Its Impact on Political Candidate Evaluation

Satire and Politics ◽

10.1007/978-3-319-56774-7_7 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 193-225 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alison O’Connor

Keyword(s):

Candidate Evaluation ◽

Political Candidate

Download Full-text

Rationalization and Derivation Processes in Survey Studies of Political Candidate Evaluation

American Journal of Political Science ◽

10.2307/2111598 ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 38 (3) ◽

pp. 582 ◽

Cited By ~ 89

Author(s):

Wendy M. Rahn ◽

Jon A. Krosnick ◽

Marijke Breuning

Keyword(s):

Candidate Evaluation ◽

Political Candidate

Download Full-text

Motivational underpinnings of support for radical political leaders

10.31234/osf.io/b62wx ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Joanna Grzymala-Moszczynska ◽

Katarzyna Jasko ◽

Marta Maj ◽

Marta Szastok ◽

Arie W. Kruglanski

Keyword(s):

Presidential Campaign ◽

Hillary Clinton ◽

Political Leaders ◽

Donald Trump ◽

Personal Significance ◽

Political Candidate ◽

The Relationship ◽

Willingness To Engage

In three studies conducted over the course of 2016 US presidential campaign we examined the relationship between radicalism of a political candidate and willingness to engage in actions for that candidate. Drawing on significance quest theory (Kruglanski et al., 2018), we predicted that people would be more willing to make large sacrifices for radical (vs. moderate) candidates because the cause of radical candidates would be more personally important and engagement on behalf it would be more psychologically rewarding. We tested these predictions among supporters of Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Bernie Sanders. Our findings were in line with these predictions, as the more followers perceived their candidates as radical, the more they viewed leaders’ ideas as personally important, gained more personal significance from those ideas, and intended to sacrifice more for the leader.

Download Full-text