Booster cushion design effects on child occupant kinematics and loading assessed using the PIPER 6-year-old HBM and the Q10 ATD in frontal impacts

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Katarina Bohman ◽  
Jonas Östh ◽  
Lotta Jakobsson ◽  
Isabelle Stockman ◽  
Maria Wimmerstedt ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Beeman ◽  
Andrew R. Kemper ◽  
Michael L. Madigan ◽  
Stefan M. Duma

Human occupant responses in motor vehicle collisions are commonly predicted and evaluated using computational models and anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs). However, these are validated using post mortem human surrogate (PMHS) studies, which do not include the effects of muscle activation. Studies have shown that tensed muscles can change occupant kinematics and subsequently the kinetics during an automotive collision [1,2,3]. Consequently, the resulting injury patterns can be altered based on muscle activation. Continued development and validation of the aforementioned research tools necessitates further analysis of the effects of muscle activation on an occupant’s biomechanical response in car crashes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of muscle tension on the occupant kinematics and kinetics in low-speed frontal sled tests.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingai Cui ◽  
Masatomo Yamaguchi ◽  
Koji Mizuno ◽  
Yoshinori Tanaka ◽  
Ryoichi Yoshida

Author(s):  
Petra Jahn ◽  
Johannes Engelkamp

There is ample evidence that memory for action phrases such as “open the bottle” is better in subject-performed tasks (SPTs), i.e., if the participants perform the actions, than in verbal tasks (VTs), if they only read the phrases or listen to them. It is less clear whether also the sole intention to perform the actions later, i.e., a prospective memory task (PT), improves memory compared with VTs. Inconsistent findings have been reported for within-subjects and between-subjects designs. The present study attempts to clarify the situation. In three experiments, better recall for SPTs than for PTs and for PTs than for VTs were observed if mixed lists were used. If pure lists were used, there was a PT effect but no SPT over PT advantage. The findings were discussed from the perspective of item-specific and relational information.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingyong Fang ◽  
Jufen Yu ◽  
Jing Wang
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alexander Diederich ◽  
Christophe Bastien ◽  
Karthikeyan Ekambaram ◽  
Alexis Wilson

The introduction of automated L5 driving technologies will revolutionise the design of vehicle interiors and seating configurations, improving occupant comfort and experience. It is foreseen that pre-crash emergency braking and swerving manoeuvres will affect occupant posture, which could lead to an interaction with a deploying airbag. This research addresses the urgent safety need of defining the occupant’s kinematics envelope during that pre-crash phase, considering rotated seat arrangements and different seatbelt configurations. The research used two different sets of volunteer tests experiencing L5 vehicle manoeuvres, based in the first instance on 22 50th percentile fit males wearing a lap-belt (OM4IS), while the other dataset is based on 87 volunteers with a BMI range of 19 to 67 kg/m2 wearing a 3-point belt (UMTRI). Unique biomechanics kinematics corridors were then defined, as a function of belt configuration and vehicle manoeuvre, to calibrate an Active Human Model (AHM) using a multi-objective optimisation coupled with a Correlation and Analysis (CORA) rating. The research improved the AHM omnidirectional kinematics response over current state of the art in a generic lap-belted environment. The AHM was then tested in a rotated seating arrangement under extreme braking, highlighting that maximum lateral and frontal motions are comparable, independent of the belt system, while the asymmetry of the 3-point belt increased the occupant’s motion towards the seatbelt buckle. It was observed that the frontal occupant kinematics decrease by 200 mm compared to a lap-belted configuration. This improved omnidirectional AHM is the first step towards designing safer future L5 vehicle interiors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (sup2) ◽  
pp. S37-S42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthikeyan Ekambaram ◽  
Richard Frampton ◽  
James Lenard

1993 ◽  
Vol 12 (13) ◽  
pp. 1259-1268 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Neuhaus ◽  
Mark R. Segal

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynda J. Kramer ◽  
Lawrence J. Prinzel III ◽  
Jarvis J. Arthur III ◽  
Randall E. Bailey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document