The Girls' Health Screen Pilot Study: A Screening Instrument for Girls in the Juvenile Detention System

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-483
Author(s):  
Mana Golzari ◽  
Cynthia J. Mollen ◽  
Leslie Acoca
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1112-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guiyoung Bong ◽  
Jeong‐Heun Kim ◽  
Yoohwa Hong ◽  
Nan‐He Yoon ◽  
Hyunjung Sunwoo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Antonieta Tinôco ◽  
Élvio Rúbio Gouveia ◽  
Andreas Ihle ◽  
Adilson Marques ◽  
Bruna R. Gouveia ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: To study the reliability/stability of the Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) for the assessment of cognitive functions, and to investigate the concurrent validity (that is, the relationship between the COGTEL scores and external variables, such as level of education and MMSE results) in a pilot study of elderly persons residing in the community in the municipal regions of Apuí, Fonte Boa and Manaus (Amazonas, Brazil). Method: This pilot study included 90 elderly persons (29 men and 61 women) aged 60-85 years of age [68.2 (± 6.7)]. The COGTEL, the MMSE and socio-economic survey were applied in the form of two interviews, a week apart and under the same conditions. Results: The test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient of the COGTEL total score (and respective six subtests), MMSE and educational level ranged from acceptable to high (0.708 < R <0.946). There was a strong positive correlation between the total score of the COGTEL with the MMSE (r =0.682; p <0.001), as well as with educational level (r =0.604; p <0.001). Conclusion: This study presents preliminary evidence of the reliability/stability and concurrent validity of the COGTEL in the evaluation of cognitive functions in elderly persons residing in the community. The results of this study support the use of COGTEL as a short, reliable and valid instrument for analyzing differences in cognitive functioning in inter-individual studies with elderly persons.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 849-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth P. Shulman ◽  
Jordan Bechtold ◽  
Erin L. Kelly ◽  
Elizabeth Cauffman

Allocating limited mental health resources is a challenge for juvenile justice facilities. We evaluated the clinical utility of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument, Version 2 (MAYSI-2)—an instrument designed to aid in this process—in three subsamples of justice-involved youth (ages 14-17): detained girls ( n = 69), detained boys ( n = 130), and incarcerated boys ( n = 373). For perspective, we compared its performance (in the incarcerated subsample) to that of the Youth Self-Report (YSR), a more widely-used screen. The MAYSI-2 subscales were moderately useful for detecting relevant diagnoses, and differences were observed across samples. However, as a general mental health screen, the MAYSI-2 performed well (and comparably to the YSR), correctly classifying 66% to 75% of youth. When used to differentiate youth with any and without any disorder, both instruments were effective. Given the MAYSI-2’s practical advantages over the YSR (lower cost, easier administration), it may be a better option for juvenile facilities.


2008 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 1093-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
For-Wey Lung ◽  
Bih-Ching Shu ◽  
Tung-Liang Chiang ◽  
Shio Jean Lin

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
Ana Letícia Santos Nunes ◽  
Alberto Filgueiras ◽  
Rodrigo Nicolato ◽  
Jussara Mendonça Alvarenga ◽  
Luciana Angélica Silva Silveira ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: This article aims to describe the adaptation and translation process of the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) and its reduced version, the Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI) for Brazilian Portuguese, as well as its validation. Methods: Semantic equivalence processes included four steps: translation, back translation, evaluation of semantic equivalence and a pilot-study. Validation consisted of simultaneous applications of the instrument in Portuguese by two examiners in 30 catatonic and 30 non-catatonic patients. Results: Total scores averaged 20.07 for the complete scale and 7.80 for its reduced version among catatonic patients, compared with 0.47 and 0.20 among non-catatonic patients, respectively. Overall values of inter-rater reliability of the instruments were 0.97 for the BFCSI and 0.96 for the BFCRS. Conclusion: The scale's version in Portuguese proved to be valid and was able to distinguish between catatonic and non-catatonic patients. It was also reliable, with inter-evaluator reliability indexes as high as those of the original instrument.


2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. e69-e70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Yamamoto ◽  
Miki Tanioka ◽  
Yasuaki Hayashino ◽  
Hiroki Mishina ◽  
Mayumi Kato ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Gamble ◽  
Sherrie Sonnenberg ◽  
John D. Haltigan ◽  
Amy Cuzzola-Kern

Overcrowding in juvenile detention facilities continues to pose problems for many jurisdictions. This article examines detention screening as a policy response to overcrowding. It presents evidence, based on more than 1,000 admissions to secure detention, that a very simple detention-screening instrument can provide safe and effective utilization management for secure detention resources. The information gathered from the use of a detention-screening instrument can also be used to examine the extent to which extralegal factors such as gender, age, and race enter into detention decisions. Results indicate that detention screening is an effective mechanism for census management and that after controlling for legal factors, females are detained at a higher rate than males are and youth younger than 14 are detained at a higher rate than older youth are. Finally, in a finding inconsistent with much of the literature, after controlling for legal variables in this population, White youth are detained for less serious offenses than Black youth are.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. S214 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hadbavna ◽  
B. Drumm ◽  
N. Hearne ◽  
M. Moran ◽  
T. Coughlan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document