Bearing capacity assessment of a 14th century arch bridge in Lecco (Italy)

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Martinelli ◽  
Andrea Galli ◽  
Luigi Barazzetti ◽  
Matteo Colombo ◽  
Roberto Felicetti ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 05019008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Zani ◽  
Paolo Martinelli ◽  
Andrea Galli ◽  
Carmelo Gentile ◽  
Marco di Prisco

2011 ◽  
Vol 295-297 ◽  
pp. 1079-1087
Author(s):  
Guo Hui Cao ◽  
Zhen Yu Xie ◽  
Ming Cai Wen ◽  
Ran He

The ultimate bearing capacity test is carried on CFST arch bridge model with CFRP slings, and the deflection of tie-beams, CFST arch, crossbeams, decks is also tested. Studies have shown that before the sliping of 4# CFRP sling, the deflection growth of east and west tie-beam, east and west arch both has good symmetry. The deflection growth of crossbeams and decks also has good symmetry, but after the sliping of 4# CFRP sling(located at the middle of west tie-beam), the structural internal forces redistribution appeared. The deflection of west tie-beam increased suddenly, and the mid-span deflection of west tie-beam is larger than that of east tie-beam by 14.6%. The mid-span deflection of east arch is larger than that of west arch by 9.9%. The deflection of crossbeam at 3L/8 and L/4 sections are respectively larger than those of crossbeam at 5L/8 and 3L/4 sections by 13.8% and 5.3%, The deflection of 3#, 2# and 1# decks are respectively larger than those of 4#, 5# and 6# decks by 7.8%, 13.2% and 17.1%. After the snapping of 10# CFRP sling(located at 3L/8 section of east tie-beam), the structural internal forces would appear redistribution. The deflection of east tie-beam would increase suddenly. The mid-span deflection of east tie-beam is larger than that of west tie-beam by 31.7%, and the mid-span deflection of east arch is larger than that of west arch by 21.3%. The deflection of crossbeam at 3L/8 and L/4 sections are respectively larger than those of 5L/8 and 3L/4 sections by 24.7% and 22.5%. The deflection of 3#, 2# and 1# decks are respectively larger than those of 4#, 5# and 6# decks by 16.2%, 24.5% and 28.6%.


2013 ◽  
Vol 838-841 ◽  
pp. 1042-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Meng Zhao ◽  
Feng Jin Chen ◽  
Jin Yi Chai ◽  
Zhen Ji Wang ◽  
Hou Lin Zhou

This paper examines the bearing capacity and stability of a catenary axis uniform cross-section multi-span stone arch bridge with solid spandrels after strengthening and widening, in the light of the Code for Design of Highway Masonry Bridges and Culverts (JTG D61-2005) published by the Ministry of Communications of the People's Republic of China. Taking the West Ulanhot Large Bridge built in cold area of Inner Mongolia in 1960s as an example, the effect of dead load, live load and temperature variation after and before strengthening as well as multi-arch action were considered. Through calculating the bearing capacity and stability of stone multiple arch bridge, compared with the results of loading test and follow-up survey on operation condition for many years, the safety and effectiveness of strengthening scheme are evaluated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document