Discussion of alcohol consequences during a brief motivational intervention session: comparing those who do and do not increase readiness to change

Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Merrill ◽  
Gabriela López ◽  
Angela K. Stevens ◽  
Samyukta Singh ◽  
M. Barton Laws ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Arnaud ◽  
Christiane Baldus ◽  
Tobias H. Elgán ◽  
Hanne Tønnesen ◽  
Nina De Paepe ◽  
...  

Abstract. Aims: In this article we explore the moderators of effectiveness of WISEteens (Web-based brief Intervention for SubstancE using teens), a fully automated web-based brief motivational intervention targeting risky substance use among adolescents. Based on previous studies, we examined the differential effects on drinking of sex, readiness to change, self-efficacy, alcohol risk status, and parental monitoring as hypothesized moderators. Methods: We analyzed completers data from a two-armed RCT study with follow-up assessment after 3 months, including N = 211 self-enrolled adolescents (16 – 18 years) who screened positive for at-risk substance use in Sweden, Belgium, the Czech Republic, and Germany. The trial compared a single-session brief motivational intervention to an assessment-only control group with AUDIT-C scores for drinking frequency, quantity, and frequency of binge drinking in the past month as study outcome. Results: The analyses revealed a statistically significant moderation effect for sex on drinking in the previous month, with a stronger effect for males. In contrast, readiness to change, self-efficacy, alcohol risk status, and parental monitoring did not moderate the effects. Conclusions: Although the trial was limited by large dropout, our findings imply that web-based interventions can be particularly effective for male adolescents, although the effects of WISEteens were largely independent of other individual characteristics. Web-based brief intervention should integrate gender-specific components to raise effectiveness for females.


2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Dench ◽  
Gerald Bennett

Motivational intervention, a strategy to increase motivation for change, was tested as an addition to treatment at the start of an outpatient programme for alcohol dependence. Admissions to the programme were randomly allocated to either a motivational or educational procedure. The three motivational constructs of the SOCRATES-8A Readiness to Change questionnaire (Ambivalence about change, Recognition of problems, Taking Steps to change) were used as measures of motivation for change. At one week post-intervention, motivational participants reported significantly greater levels of problem recognition. The motivational group's post-intervention scores were significantly higher on the Taking Steps scale and significantly lower on the Ambivalence scale. There was no difference on measures of engagement in treatment or drop-out from the outpatient treatment programme. For the population as a whole, a relatively low pre-intervention score on the Ambivalence scale was predictive of drop-out. Results support the efficacy of motivational intervention for decreasing self-reported levels of ambivalence about change and for increasing problem recognition and taking steps towards change. More detailed research with a longer follow-up period is needed to determine whether this has any impact on other vectors of motivation for change, including participation in treatment, outcome expectancy and drinking behaviour.


2005 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Bernstein ◽  
Edward Bernstein ◽  
Katherine Tassiopoulos ◽  
Timothy Heeren ◽  
Suzette Levenson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 732-742
Author(s):  
Justin Walthers ◽  
Tim Janssen ◽  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
Ariel Hoadley ◽  
Nancy P. Barnett ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document