Interfacial Area Transport of Bubbly Flow in a Small Diameter Pipe

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 614-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi HIBIKI ◽  
Tomoji TAKAMASA ◽  
Mamoru ISHII
Author(s):  
Sungje Hong ◽  
Joshua P. Schlegel ◽  
Subash L. Sharma

Abstract This paper describes the modeling of flow regimes beyond bubbly flows in a large diameter channel considering polydispersity and bubble induced turbulence using the Eulerian two-fluid approach. A two-bubble-group approach with two-group interfacial area transport equations (IATEs) is used to demonstrate flow phenomena in a large diameter pipe. Source and sink terms for mass and momentum exchanges between the two groups of bubbles and for bubble coalescence and breakup mechanisms are implemented. For predicting particle size and its distribution, S-Gamma (Sγ) model is used. The Sγ model with two-group IATEs are evaluated by comparing local distributions of void fractions and Sauter mean diameters with results of adaptive-multiple-size-group (AMUSIG) models and experimental dataset developed by Schlegel et al., (2012) for model validations. It shows that two-group IATEs with Sγ model predict reasonably accurate flow characteristics of beyond bubbly flow regimes, but also show shortcomings in their accuracies predicting local distributions, which imply that further studies for modeling of interfacial force are needed.


Author(s):  
Deoras Prabhudharwadkar ◽  
Chris Bailey ◽  
Martin Lopez de Bertodano ◽  
John R. Buchanan

This paper describes in detail the assessment of the CFD code CFX to predict adiabatic liquid-gas two-phase bubbly flow. This study has been divided into two parts. In the first exercise, the effect of Lift Force, Wall Force and the Turbulent Diffusion Force have been assessed using experimental data from the literature for air-water upward bubbly flows through a pipe. The data used here had a characteristic near wall void peaking which was largely influenced by the joint action of the three forces mentioned above. The simulations were performed with constant bubble diameter assuming no bubble interactions. This exercise resulted in selection of the most appropriate closure form and closure coefficients for the above mentioned forces for the range of flow conditions chosen. In the second exercise, the One-Group Interfacial Area Transport equation was introduced in the two-fluid model of CFX. The interfacial area density plays important role in the correct prediction of interfacial mass, momentum and energy transfer and is affected by bubble breakup and coalescence processes in adiabatic flows. The One-Group Interfacial Area Transport Equation (IATE) has been developed and implemented for one-dimensional models and validated using cross-sectional area averaged experimental data over the last decade by various researchers. The original one-dimensional model has been extended to multidimensional flow predictions in this study and the results are presented in this paper. The paper also discusses constraints posed by the commercial CFD code CFX and the solutions worked out to obtain the most accurate implementation of the model.


Author(s):  
Tatsuya Hazuku ◽  
Tomoji Takamasa ◽  
Takashi Hibiki ◽  
Mamoru Ishii

Axial developments of one-dimensional void fraction, bubble number density, interfacial area concentration, and Sauter mean diameter of adiabatic nitrogen-water bubbly flows in a 9-mm-diameter pipe were measured under a microgravity environment using an image-processing method. The interfacial area transport mechanism was determined based on visual observation. Marked bubble coalescence occurred when fast-moving bubbles near the channel center overtook and swept up slower-moving bubbles in the vicinity of the channel wall (velocity profile entrainment). Negligible bubble breakup was observed because of weak turbulence under tested flow conditions. Axial changes of measured interfacial area concentrations were compared with the interfacial area transport equation considering the bubble expansion and wake entrainment as observed under a normal gravity environment. The velocity profile entrainment effect under microgravity was likely to be comparable to the wake entrainment effect under normal gravity in the tested flow conditions. This apparently led to insignificant differences between measured interfacial area concentrations and those predicted by the interfacial area transport equation with the wake entrainment model under normal gravity. Possible bubble coalescence mechanisms would differ, however, between normal gravity and microgravity conditions.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Takamasa ◽  
T. Iguchi ◽  
T. Hazuku ◽  
T. Hibiki ◽  
M. Ishii

2002 ◽  
Vol 2002.4 (0) ◽  
pp. 205-206
Author(s):  
Norihiro FUKAMACHI ◽  
Tatsuya HAZUKU ◽  
Tomoji TAKAMASA ◽  
Takashi HIBIKI ◽  
Mamoru ISHII

2003 ◽  
Vol 219 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungjin Kim ◽  
Xiaodong Sun ◽  
Mamoru Ishii ◽  
Stephen G. Beus ◽  
F. Lincoln

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document