What About Writing? A National Exploratory Study of Writing Instruction in Teacher Preparation Programs

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Myers ◽  
Roya Q. Scales ◽  
Dana L. Grisham ◽  
Thomas DeVere Wolsey ◽  
Sherry Dismuke ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Andrene J. Castro ◽  
Wesley L. Edwards

The teacher education and preparation marketplace is a complex mix of traditional and alternative programs. Though prior studies have identified a great deal of variation across these programs, an analysis of innovation has been limited. Drawing on theories of organizational innovation, and specifically, dimensions of innovation related to organizational structure, processes, and outcomes, we conduct an exploratory study of innovation in Texas’ teacher preparation marketplace. This descriptive study of teacher preparation programs includes an analysis of state and national data across three years (2014-2017). Data also include results from a content analysis of 30 sample program websites. Although most programs met accountability requirements, we found few programs signaled innovation related to program, teacher, and workforce characteristics. Rather, we identified organizational assimilation as programs adopted similar features to remain competitive. Our analysis suggests programs should critically unpack what it means to be innovative in a dynamic and competitive teacher preparation marketplace.


Author(s):  
Frank C. Worrell ◽  
Mary M. Brabeck ◽  
Carol Anne Dwyer ◽  
Kurt F. Geisinger ◽  
Ronald W. Marx ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria S. Pak ◽  
Antony N. Lyovkin ◽  
Michael J. Sanger ◽  
Erik L. Brincks ◽  
Amy J. Phelps

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory Koedel ◽  
Eric Parsons ◽  
Michael Podgursky ◽  
Mark Ehlert

We compare teacher preparation programs in Missouri based on the effectiveness of their graduates in the classroom. The differences in effectiveness between teachers from different preparation programs are much smaller than has been suggested in previous work. In fact, virtually all of the variation in teacher effectiveness comes from within-program differences between teachers. Prior research has overstated differences in teacher performance across preparation programs by failing to properly account for teacher sampling.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 728-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Brady ◽  
Katie Miller ◽  
Jazarae McCormick ◽  
Lawrence A. Heiser

Educators struggle with “value-added” teacher evaluation models based on high-stakes student assessments. Despite validity and reliability threats, these models evaluate university-based teacher preparation programs (TPPs), and play a role in state and professional accreditation. This study reports a more rational value-added evaluation model linking student performance to teacher candidates’ lessons during Practicum and Student Teaching. Results indicate that K-12 students showed learning gains on these lessons, with mixed findings on comparisons of part-time to full-time internships, academic and functional lessons, and candidates’ grade point averages (GPAs). Results indicated that teacher candidates’ lessons are a viable value-added model (VAM) alternative for TPPs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document