Impacts of augmenting heliports with school playgrounds on air medical transport time

Author(s):  
Soyoung Jung ◽  
Xiao Qin
CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S2) ◽  
pp. S30-S37
Author(s):  
Alanna Wong ◽  
Aidan McParland ◽  
Brodie Nolan

ABSTRACTObjectivesPopulation density can limit the level of care that can be provided in local facilities in Ontario, and as such, patients with severe illnesses often require interfacility transfers to access specialized care. This study aimed to identify causes of delay in interfacility transport by air ambulance in Ontario.MethodsCauses of delay were identified by manual review of electronic patient care records (ePCRs). All emergent interfacility transfers conducted by Ornge, the sole provider of air-based medical transport in Ontario, between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016 were included. The ePCRs were reviewed if they met one or more of the following: (1) contained a standardized delay code; (2) contained free text including “delay”, “wait”, or “duty-out”; (3) were above the 75th percentile in total transport time; or (4) were above the 90th percentile in time to bedside, time at the sending hospital, or time to receiving facility.ResultsOur search strategy identified 1,220 ePCRs for manual review, which identified a total of 872 delays. Common delays cited included aircraft refueling (234 delays), waiting for land emergency medical service (EMS) escort (146), and staffing- or dispatch-related issues (124). Other delays included weather/environmental hazards (43); mechanical issues (36); and procedures, imaging, or stabilization (80).ConclusionsSome common causes of interfacility delay are potentially modifiable: better trip planning around refueling and improved coordination with local EMS, could reduce delays experienced during interfacility trips. To better understand causes of delay, we would benefit from improved documentation and record availability which limited the results in this study.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreia Marques-Baptista ◽  
Pamela Ohman-Strickland ◽  
Kimberly T. Baldino ◽  
Michael Prasto ◽  
Mark A. Merlin

AbstractObjective:The objective of this study was to evaluate the time saved by usage of lights and siren (L&S) during emergency medical transport and measure the total number of time-critical hospital interventions gained by this time difference.Methods:A retrospective study was performed of all advanced life support (ALS) transports using lights and siren to this university emergency department during a three-week period. Consecutive times were measured for 112 transports and compared with measured transport times for a personal vehicle traveling the same day of the week and time of day without lights and siren. The time-critical hospital interventions are defined as procedures or treatments that could not be performed in the prehospital setting requiring a physician. The project assessed whether the patients received the hospital interventions within the average time saved using lights and siren transport.Results:The average difference in time with versus without L&S was -2.62 minutes (95% CI: -2.60− -2.63, paired t-test p <0.0001). The average transport time with L&S was 14.5 ±7.9 minutes (min) (1 standard deviation/minute (min), range = 1–36 min.). The average transport time without L&S was 17.1 ±8.3 min (range = 1−40 min). Of the 112 charts evaluated, five patients (4.5%) received time-critical hospital interventions. No patients received time-critical interventions within the time saved by utilizing lights and siren. Longer distances did not result in time saved with lights and siren.Conclusions:Limiting lights and siren use to the patients requiring hospital interventions will decrease the risks of injury and death, while adding the benefit of time saved in these critical patients.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitya Rao ◽  
Joshua Chang ◽  
David Paydarfar

Introduction: Numerous studies have found evidence of disparities in the treatment and health outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke. As minimizing time to treatment is essential in acute ischemic stroke management, we aimed to assess for racial disparities in emergency stroke transport. Emergency transport times are dependent on the geographic distribution of patients and hospitals, but previous studies have not controlled for racial variation in spatial distributions when assessing for disparity. Methods: Using a novel dataset of 2,518 unique entries with detailed spatial and temporal information on all suspected stroke transports conducted by a public emergency medical service in Central Texas over eight years, we conducted one-way ANOVA tests with post-hoc pairwise t-tests to assess how mean hospital transport time varied by patient race and developed a spatially-independent metric of emergency transport urgency. Results: Results are reported as means with standard errors and p-values from post-hoc pairwise testing. We found that mean transport time to a hospital was 2.5 minutes shorter for black patients (10.9 +/- 0.274 minutes) compared to white patients (13.4 +/- 0.174 minutes) with p < 0.0001. However, white patients’ transport times to a hospital were found to be, on average, 4.1 +/- 0.085 minutes shorter than expected compared to 3.4 +/- 0.124 minutes shorter than expected for black patients (p = 0.00015). Using a novel transport urgency index, we demonstrate that these findings represent race-based variation in spatial distributions rather than racial bias in emergency medical transport. Conclusion: In summary, these results highlight the importance of closely examining spatial distributions when utilizing spatial data to investigate geographically-dependent research questions.


Author(s):  
Shun Ah Chung ◽  
Hee Jin Kim ◽  
Bo Young Park ◽  
Hae Moon Phyen
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Bruckart ◽  
Martin Quattlebaum ◽  
Joseph R. Licina ◽  
Bill Olding

2021 ◽  
pp. 105382592110190
Author(s):  
Chris North ◽  
Simon Beames ◽  
Toby Stanton ◽  
Bacon Chan

Background: During transport to and from outdoor education field trips, students experience a period of togetherness and minimal imposed structure. Transport time also appears to align with Oldenburg’s third places, where people spend time together without a particular agenda. Purpose: To examine educators’ perspectives on the contribution that transport time makes to OE programs through an analysis featuring the characteristics of third places. Methodology/Approach: The perspectives of 16 outdoor educators (four each from New Zealand, Australia, Hong Kong, and Scotland) were gathered using a semi-structured interview protocol. Data were analyzed using a deductive process based on the third place characteristics; four unforeseen themes also emerged. Findings/Conclusions: Findings highlighted the centrality of conversation between students and between students and educators; the low profile of transport time; and a sense of excitement and fun. Students controlled the intensity of their “presence” through the use of devices (where allowed) and by selecting their sitting position in the vehicle. Implications: The findings show that transport time allowed students to have a broad variety of conversations that could be variously silly and fun, deep and introspective. Educators are encouraged to more carefully consider the contribution that transport time makes to their programs.


Author(s):  
Darren Braude ◽  
Michael Lauria ◽  
Margaret O'Donnell ◽  
Jodine Shelly ◽  
Michael Berve ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document