Analysis on the Natural Organic Matter and Disinfection By-Products in Full-scale Advanced Water Treatment Plant and Conventional Water Treatment Plant

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (31-33) ◽  
pp. 6288-6298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jei-cheol Jeon ◽  
Chang-Hyun Jo ◽  
Ilhwan Choi ◽  
Soon-Buhm Kwon[a] Ennkyung Jang ◽  
Tae-Mun Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Natural Organic Matter ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Water Treatment Plant ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
By Products

Natural Organic Matter and Disinfectant By-Products (DBPs) Formation Potential in Agriculture Area in Malaysia

2015 ◽  
Vol 802 ◽  
pp. 513-518
Author(s):  
Nurazim Ibrahim ◽  
Hamidi Abdul Aziz ◽  
Mohd Suffian Yusoff
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Natural Organic Matter ◽  
Distribution System ◽  
Water Distribution ◽  
Water Distribution System ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Water Treatment Plant ◽  
Treatment Processes ◽  
By Products

Natural organic matter (NOM) in water reacts with chlorine or other disinfectants and form hazardous disinfectant by-products (DBPs). This study aimed to detect the presence of NOM in a conventional water distribution system using UV absorbance at 254 nm as a surrogate. Two water treatment plants were selected, namely, Jalan Baharu Water Treatment Plant (JBWTP) and Lubok Buntar Water Treatment Plant (LBWTP). Aside from determining the amount of NOM, the reduction of UV254after completing the series of treatments (coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection) was also observed. The presence of UV254in both raw water and treated water samples confirmed the presence of NOM. The concentration of UV254recorded at JBWTP and LBWTP were 0.14 and 0.13 cm−1, respectively. After the treatment processes, the concentration was reduced to 0.04 cm−1for JBWTP and 0.03 cm−1for LBWTP. These results indicated that the water supply in both plants contains DBP precursors and implied the possibility of DBP formation in the system. Moreover, the percentage reduction of UV254recorded were 69% and 75% for JBWTP and LBWTP, respectively.

Removal of natural organic matter at the Gunbower water treatment plant in northern Victoria, Australia

2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (20) ◽  
pp. 9061-9069
Author(s):  
Sanghyun Jeong ◽  
Tien Vinh Nguyen ◽  
Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran ◽  
Jaya Kandasamy ◽  
Dharma Dharmabalan
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Natural Organic Matter ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Water Treatment Plant

Speciation and seasonal variation of various disinfection by-products in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant in East China

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1579-1586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang-Ren Zhou ◽  
Yi-Li Lin ◽  
Tian-Yang Zhang ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Wen-Hai Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Drinking Water Treatment ◽  
Water Treatment Plant ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
East China ◽  
Raw Water ◽  
Drinking Water Treatment Plant ◽  
By Products

Abstract The objective of this research was to study the occurrence and seasonal variations of disinfection by-products (DBPs), including traditional carbonaceous and emerging nitrogenous DBPs, in a full-scale drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) for nearly 2 years. The removal efficiencies of each DBP through the treatment processes were also investigated. This DWTP takes raw water from the Yangtze River in East China. The quality of the raw water used in this DWTP varied with different seasons. The results suggested that DBP concentrations of the finished water were higher in spring (82.33 ± 15.12 μg/L) and summer (117.29 ± 9.94 μg/L) with higher dissolved organic carbon (DOC) levels, but lower in autumn (41.10 ± 5.82 μg/L) and winter (78.47 ± 2.74 μg/L) with lower DOC levels. Due to the increase of bromide concentration in spring and winter, more toxic brominated DBPs increased obviously and took up a greater proportion. In this DWTP, DBP concentrations increased dramatically after pre-chlorination, especially in summer. It is noteworthy that the removal of DBPs during the subsequent treatment was more obvious in spring than in the other three seasons because the pH value is more beneficial to coagulation in spring.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document