chlorine disinfection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

224
(FIVE YEARS 40)

H-INDEX

32
(FIVE YEARS 5)

Author(s):  
Adam M.-A. Simpson ◽  
Min-Jeong Suh ◽  
Michael J. Plewa ◽  
William A. Mitch

Chemosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 132731
Author(s):  
Lin Deng ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
Tingting Huang ◽  
Longjia Wen ◽  
Rajendra Prasad Singh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudipti Arora ◽  
Aditi Nag ◽  
Aakanksha Kalra ◽  
Vikky Sinha ◽  
Ekta Meena ◽  
...  

AbstractThe present study tracked the city-wide dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome-corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in the wastewater from nine different wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Jaipur during second wave of COVID-19 out-break in India. A total of 164 samples were collected weekly between February 19th and June 8th, 2021. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 47.2% (52/110) influent samples and 37% (20/54) effluent samples. The increasing percentage of positive influent samples correlated with the city’s increasing active clinical cases during the second wave of COVID-19 in Jaipur. Furthermore, WBE based evidence clearly showed early detection of about 20 days (9/9 samples reported positive on April 20th, 2021) prior to the maximum cases & maximum deaths reported in the city on May 8th, 2021. The present study further observed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in treated effluents at the time window of maximum active cases in the city even after tertiary disinfection treatments of UV & Chlorine. The average genome concentration in the effluents and removal efficacy of six commonly used treatments; Activated Sludge Treatment + Chlorine disinfection (ASP + Cl2), Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) with Ultraviolet radiations disinfection (MBBR + UV), MBBR + Chlorine (Cl2), Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) and SBR + Cl2 were compared with removal efficacy of SBR + Cl2 (81.2%)> MBBR + UV (68.8%) > SBR (57.1%) > ASP (50%) > MBBR + Cl2(36.4%). The study observed the trends & prevalence of four genes (E, RdRp, N, and ORF1ab gene) based on two different kits and found that prevalence of N> ORF1ab >RdRp> E gene, suggested that the effective genome concentration should be calculated based on the presence/absence of multiple genes. Hence, it is imperative to say that using a combination of different detection genes (E, N, RdRp & ORF1ab genes) reduce false positives in WBE.Graphical AbstractHighlightsSuccessful application of WBE with prediction of 14-20 days for COVID-19 in JaipurA comparison of SARS-CoV-2 RNA removal efficacy of 9 WWTPs was investigatedSBR showed better performance than MBBR with SARS-CoV-2 RNA removal from wastewaterPresence of SARS-CoV-2 in effluents even after UV and Chlorine disinfectionUsing a combination of different detection genes reduce false positives in WBE


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Silvia Oktavia Nur Yudiastuti ◽  
Rizza Wijaya

The value-added analysis is one of the most important investors instruments in determining the type and level of technology that will be used in the production process. The Food products added-value analysis of food products calculate the product added value due to the addition of technology types and or levels in the food processing process. The value-added analysis method used to analyze fresh edamame in this research was Hayami and Kawagoe. Edamame post-harvest processing is an important critical point in the production of fresh edamame. Abiotic contamination, presence of pesticide residues, vitamin C oxidation,  food fiber ingredients, sensory value, and color stability in post-harvest handling are some of the quality criteria that are important to be met. This research aim was to compare the fresh edamame value-added products handling using ozonated water technology with chlorine disinfection that has previously been used. Based on the research results, the added value of edamame minimal processing with ozone was  145 IDR/kg higher than chlorine processing. The addition of 45 IDR/kg as ozone technology effort investment in the edamame minimal processing has increased the edamame value-added ratio by 0.19%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document