scholarly journals An assessment of forest loss and its drivers in protected areas on the Copperbelt province of Zambia: 1972–2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-166
Author(s):  
Darius Phiri ◽  
Collins Chanda ◽  
Vincent R. Nyirenda ◽  
Chisala A. Lwali
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Panlasigui ◽  
Jimena Rico-Straffon ◽  
Alexander Pfaff ◽  
Jennifer Swenson ◽  
Colby Loucks
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Carvalho ◽  
Kerry A Brown ◽  
Adam D Gordon ◽  
Gabriel U Yesuf ◽  
Marie Jeanne Raherilalao ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite their legal protection status, protected areas (PAs) can benefit from priority ranks when ongoing threats to their biodiversity and habitats outpace the financial resources available for their conservation. It is essential to develop methods to prioritize PAs that are not computationally demanding in order to suit stakeholders in developing countries where technical and financial resources are limited. We used expert knowledge-derived biodiversity measures to generate individual and aggregate priority ranks of 98 mostly terrestrial PAs on Madagascar. The five variables used were state of knowledge (SoK), forest loss, forest loss acceleration, PA size and relative species diversity, estimated by using standardized residuals from negative binomial models of SoK regressed onto species diversity. We compared our aggregate ranks generated using unweighted averages and principal component analysis (PCA) applied to each individual variable with those generated via Markov chain (MC) and PageRank algorithms. SoK significantly affected the measure of species diversity and highlighted areas where more research effort was needed. The unweighted- and PCA-derived ranks were strongly correlated, as were the MC and PageRank ranks. However, the former two were weakly correlated with the latter two. We recommend using these methods simultaneously in order to provide decision-makers with the flexibility to prioritize those PAs in need of additional research and conservation efforts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 108299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Leberger ◽  
Isabel M.D. Rosa ◽  
Carlos A. Guerra ◽  
Florian Wolf ◽  
Henrique M. Pereira

Oryx ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörn P. W. Scharlemann ◽  
Valerie Kapos ◽  
Alison Campbell ◽  
Igor Lysenko ◽  
Neil D. Burgess ◽  
...  

AbstractForest loss and degradation in the tropics contribute 6–17% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Protected areas cover 217.2 million ha (19.6%) of the world’s humid tropical forests and contain c. 70.3 petagrams of carbon (Pg C) in biomass and soil to 1 m depth. Between 2000 and 2005, we estimate that 1.75 million ha of forest were lost from protected areas in humid tropical forests, causing the emission of 0.25–0.33 Pg C. Protected areas lost about half as much carbon as the same area of unprotected forest. We estimate that the reduction of these carbon emissions from ongoing deforestation in protected sites in humid tropical forests could be valued at USD 6,200–7,400 million depending on the land use after clearance. This is > 1.5 times the estimated spending on protected area management in these regions. Improving management of protected areas to retain forest cover better may be an important, although certainly not sufficient, component of an overall strategy for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD).


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Powlen ◽  
Michael C. Gavin ◽  
Kelly W. Jones

Understanding the factors that drive protected area outcomes is critical to increase the success of global conservation efforts. Until recently, our understanding of the influence of management effectiveness has been restricted by the limited availability of standardized management data and study design limitations of prior evaluations. Here we use a quasi-experimental matching approach to test the influence of management effectiveness on forest cover change inside 46 protected areas in Mexico. We test the influence of five management categories, including context and planning, administration and finance, use and benefits, governance and social participation, and management quality, as well as an overall effectiveness score, using a subgroup analysis and an interaction term in post-matching multiple linear regression. Our results show that protected areas with higher management effectiveness have a greater effect on reducing deforestation compared to those with low management effectiveness, but that both types of protected areas experience less forest loss compared to similar unprotected areas. We find this trend in all five of the management categories and the overall score, with administration and finance scores having the greatest effect on forest loss outcomes. Our findings suggest careful design and planning, effective participation from multiple stakeholders and equal sharing of benefits, and sufficient human and financial capital can improve the effectiveness of protected areas in preventing forest loss.


2017 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 32-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armando Apan ◽  
Luz Angelica Suarez ◽  
Tek Maraseni ◽  
Jose Alan Castillo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Buřivalová ◽  
Sarah J. Hart ◽  
Volker C. Radeloff ◽  
Umesh Srinivasan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0215820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela A. Miteva ◽  
Peter W. Ellis ◽  
Edward A. Ellis ◽  
Bronson W. Griscom

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Wade ◽  
Kemen G. Austin ◽  
James Cajka ◽  
Daniel Lapidus ◽  
Kibri H. Everett ◽  
...  

The protection of forests is crucial to providing important ecosystem services, such as supplying clean air and water, safeguarding critical habitats for biodiversity, and reducing global greenhouse gas emissions. Despite this importance, global forest loss has steadily increased in recent decades. Protected Areas (PAs) currently account for almost 15% of Earth’s terrestrial surface and protect 5% of global tree cover and were developed as a principal approach to limit the impact of anthropogenic activities on natural, intact ecosystems and habitats. We assess global trends in forest loss inside and outside of PAs, and land cover following this forest loss, using a global map of tree cover loss and global maps of land cover. While forests in PAs experience loss at lower rates than non-protected forests, we find that the temporal trend of forest loss in PAs is markedly similar to that of all forest loss globally. We find that forest loss in PAs is most commonly—and increasingly—followed by shrubland, a broad category that could represent re-growing forest, agricultural fallows, or pasture lands in some regional contexts. Anthropogenic forest loss for agriculture is common in some regions, particularly in the global tropics, while wildfires, pests, and storm blowdown are a significant and consistent cause of forest loss in more northern latitudes, such as the United States, Canada, and Russia. Our study describes a process for screening tree cover loss and agriculture expansion taking place within PAs, and identification of priority targets for further site-specific assessments of threats to PAs. We illustrate an approach for more detailed assessment of forest loss in four case study PAs in Brazil, Indonesia, Democratic Republic of Congo, and the United States.


Author(s):  
Chunting Feng ◽  
Ming Cao ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Fangzheng Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document