The Western Stemmed Tradition: Problems and Prospects in Paleoindian Archaeology in the Intermountain West

PaleoAmerica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey M. Smith ◽  
Daron Duke ◽  
Dennis L. Jenkins ◽  
Ted Goebel ◽  
Loren G. Davis ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Jazwa ◽  
Geoffrey M. Smith ◽  
Richard L. Rosencrance ◽  
Daron G. Duke ◽  
Dan Stueber

A single radiocarbon date derived from the Buhl burial in south-central Idaho has frequently been used as a data point for the interpretation of the Western Stemmed Tradition (WST) chronology and technology because of the stemmed biface found in situ with the human remains. AMS dating of bone collagen in 1991 produced an age of 10,675 ± 95 14C BP, immediately postdating the most widely accepted age range for Clovis. The Buhl burial has been cited as evidence that stemmed point technology may have overlapped with Clovis technology in the Intermountain West. We discuss concerns about the radiocarbon date, arguing that even at face value, the calibrated date has minimal overlap with Clovis at the 95.4% range. Furthermore, the C:N ratio of 3.69 in the analyzed collagen is outside of the typical range for well-preserved samples, indicating a postdepositional change in carbon composition, which may make the date erroneously older or younger than the age of the skeleton. Finally, the potential dietary incorporation of small amounts of anadromous fish may indicate that the burial is younger than traditionally accepted. For these reasons, we argue that the Buhl burial cannot be used as evidence of overlap between WST and Clovis.


Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 606-P
Author(s):  
MATTHEW WAHL ◽  
ANN HAYNES ◽  
MICHELLE L. LITCHMAN ◽  
ANGELA FAGERLIN ◽  
REBECCA K. DELANEY ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ren A. Thompson ◽  
◽  
Joseph P. Colgan ◽  
Amy K. Gilmer ◽  
Donald S. Sweetkind

Genealogy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Ed A. Muñoz

While there has been an explosion of scholarly interest in the historical and contemporary social, economic, and political status of U.S. Latinx individuals and communities, the majority focuses on traditional Southwestern U.S., Northeastern U.S., and South Florida rural/urban enclaves. Recent “New Destinations” research, however, documents the turn of the 21st century Latinx experiences in non-traditional white/black, and rural/urban Latinx regional enclaves. This socio-historical essay adds to and challenges emerging literature with a nearly five-century old delineation of Latinidad in the Intermountain West, a region often overlooked in the construction of Latina/o identity. Selected interviews from the Spanish-Speaking Peoples in Utah Oral History and Wyoming’s La Cultura Hispanic Heritage Oral History projects shed light on Latinidad and the adoption of Latinx labels in the region during the latter third of the 20th century centering historical context, material conditions, sociodemographic characteristics, and institutional processes in this decision. Findings point to important implications for the future of Latinidad in light of the region’s Latinx renaissance at the turn of the 21st century. The region’s increased Latino proportional presence, ethnic group diversity, and socioeconomic variability poses challenges to the region’s long-established Hispano/Nuevo Mexicano Latinidad.


1984 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 502
Author(s):  
John G. Packer ◽  
Arthur Cronquist ◽  
Arthur H. Holmgren ◽  
Noel H. Holmgren ◽  
James L. Reveal ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam B. Haddad ◽  
Christina A. Porucznik ◽  
Kerry E. Joyce ◽  
Anindya K. De ◽  
Andrew T. Pavia ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 386-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Beck ◽  
George T. Jones

AbstractFiedel and Morrow challenge our argument that Clovis technology originated in the southern Plains or Southeast and from there was carried by populations migrating north. Upon entering the Intermountain West relatively late, they encountered a population utilizing a different technology (Western Stemmed), the latter having arrived independently from the Pacific coast. Fiedel and Morrow offer arguments in favor of Clovis-first in the Intermountain West and coastal California and against the coastal route, Clovis origins in the south, and technological differences between Clovis and Western Stemmed. We evaluate these arguments and find their supporting evidence, when provided, meager and unconvincing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document