scholarly journals Real-world use and clinical outcomes after 24 weeks of treatment with a prescription digital therapeutic for opioid use disorder

Author(s):  
Yuri A. Maricich ◽  
Robert Gerwien ◽  
Alice Kuo ◽  
Daniel C. Malone ◽  
Fulton F. Velez
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
James B. Anderson ◽  
Stephen A. Martin ◽  
Anne Gadomski ◽  
Nicole Krupa ◽  
Daniel Mullin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yuri A. Maricich ◽  
Xiaorui Xiong ◽  
Robert Gerwien ◽  
Alice Kuo ◽  
Fulton Velez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Seaman ◽  
Wren Ronan ◽  
Lauren Myers ◽  
Haven Wheelock ◽  
Melinda Butler ◽  
...  

Background: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) treatment in people who inject drugs (PWID) is a key component of elimination models but PWID face substantial barriers to treatment access. Despite data showing treatment outcomes among PWID on medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are similar to non-PWID outcomes, few studies examine PWID treatment outcomes with only syringe services support. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of recruitment for HCV treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir (E/G) in a syringe services program (SSP) as compared to an MOUD program for people with opioid use disorder. Methods: This real-world, multi-site prospective open-label pilot study compares treatment of PWID with aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio (APRI) < 0.7 and genotype 1a, 1b, and 4 HCV with E/G, engaged in MOUD (n = 25) or an SSP (n = 25). The MOUD arm was enrolled through a federally qualified community health center and SSP arm through a nearby SSP. Prospective arms were compared to an academic hepatology clinic group (n = 50). Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12), medication adherence, and treatment discontinuation were evaluated. Results: In the MOUD vs SSP arms, substance use throughout treatment was found in 36% (9/25) vs 100% (25/25); good adherence (> 90% pills taken) in 100% (25/25) vs 68% (17/25); treatment completion 100% (25/25) vs 64% (16/25); and SVR12 rates were 96% (24/25) vs 60% (15/25). In the community standard comparison group, SVR12 was achieved in 94% (47/50). There were two virologic failures or re-infections in the SSP group; all other non-responders were due to missing SVR12 data. Conclusions: While recruitment and follow-up are challenging in SSPs, preliminary data suggests adherence, treatment completion, and SVR12 are high in PWID treated with E/G engaging in SSP or MOUD. All metrics are comparable to community standards for non-PWID for treatment of HCV with direct-antiviral drugs.


Author(s):  
Fulton F Velez ◽  
Sam Colman ◽  
Laura Kauffman ◽  
Kathryn Anastassopoulos ◽  
Sean Murphy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S40-S40
Author(s):  
Joella W Adams ◽  
Alexandra Savinkina ◽  
Mam Jarra Gai ◽  
Allison Hill ◽  
James Hudspeth ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Drug use-associated infective endocarditis (DUA-IE) is typically treated with 4-6 weeks of in hospital intravenous antibiotics (IVA). Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and partial oral antibiotics (PO) may be as effective as IVA, though long-term outcomes and costs remain unknown. We evaluated the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of four antibiotic treatment strategies for DUA-IE. Methods We used a validated microsimulation model to compare: 1) 4-6 weeks of inpatient IVA along with opioid detoxification, status quo (SQ); 2) 4-6 weeks of inpatient IVA along with inpatient addiction care services (ACS) which offers medications for opioid use disorder (SQ with ACS); 3) 3 weeks of inpatient IVA with ACS followed by OPAT (OPAT); and 4) 3 weeks of IVA with ACS followed by PO antibiotics (PO). We derived model inputs from clinical trials and observational cohorts. All patients were eligible for either in-home or post-acute care OPAT. Outcomes included life years (LYs), discounted costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), proportion of DUA-IE cured, and mortality attributable to DUA-IE. Costs (&US) were annually discounted at 3%. We performed probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) to address uncertainty. Results The SQ scenario resulted in 18.64 LY at a cost of &416,800/person with 77.4% hospitalized DUA-IE patients cured and 5% of deaths in the population were attributable to DUA-IE. Life expectancy was extended by each strategy: 0.017y in SQ with ACS, 0.011 in OPAT, and 0.024 in PO. The PO strategy provided the highest cure rate (80.2%), compared to 77.9% in SQ with ACS and 78.5% in OPAT and X in SQ. OPAT was the least expensive strategy at &412,300/person, Compared to OPAT, PO had an ICER of &141,500/LY. Both SQ strategies provided worse clinical outcomes for money invested than either OPAT or PO (dominated). All scenarios decreased deaths attributable to DUA-IE compared to SQ. Findings were robust in PSA. Table 1 Selected cost and clinical outcomes comparing treatment strategies for drug-use associated infective endocarditis including the status quo, status quo with addiction care services, outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy, and partial oral antibiotics. Conclusion Treating DUA-IE with OPAT along with ACS increases the number of people completing treatment, decreases DUA-IE mortality, and is cost-saving compared to the status quo. The PO strategy also improves clinical outcomes, but may not be cost-effective at the willingness-to-pay threshold of &100,000. Disclosures Simeon D. Kimmel, MD, MA, Abt Associates for a Massachusetts Department of Public Health project to improve access to medications for opioid use disorder in nursing facilities (Consultant)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document