“Who Had to Die So I Could Go Camping?”: Shifting non-Native conceptions of land and environment through engagement with Indigenous thought and action

Author(s):  
J. M. Bacon
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Foley

The collective aim of many of this Journal's readers is to provide Indigenous Australians with a sound education to allow us (Indigenous Australia) to take a more active role in Australian society. My personal research interest is in business studies, training Indigenous Australians in management and business principles. I continually face the question of am I training my kin in a Western science that is often at the opposite end of the spectrum to Indigenous thought and practice?


2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Nakata ◽  
Vicky Nakata ◽  
Sarah Keech ◽  
Reuben Bolt

The challenges of finding more productive ways of teaching and learning in Australian Indigenous Studies have been a key focal point for the Australian Indigenous Studies Learning and Teaching Network. This article contributes to this discussion by drawing attention to new possibilities for teaching and learning practices amid the priority being given to the more practice-oriented educational approaches for future professionals and the cultural competencies of all students and staff. We explore courses sequenced as Indigenous Studies Majors and discuss two different conceptualisations for framing teaching and learning in Indigenous Studies courses — decolonising theory and cultural interface theory — and the implications for some of the teaching and learning practices they facilitate, including the positioning of students and the development of dispositions for future professional practice. We suggest that those academic teams who structure course sequences in Indigenous Studies have a role to play in experimenting with shifts in teaching and learning frameworks and the design of course sequences to encourage approaches that are more focused on developing students’ breadth and depth of knowledge of the field, as well as their capacities for deeper engagements with Indigenous thought and the scholarly disciplines.


1910 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-242
Author(s):  
J. P. Jones
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Laura Mues De Schrenk

The term ‘pre-Columbian thought’ refers to the set of beliefs and ideas held by the civilizations existing in Latin America prior to the arrival of Columbus in 1492. Research in pre-Columbian thought poses several questions linked to language, interpretation, chronology and cultural diversity. They can roughly be organized according to the three main regions in which the indigenous cultures flourished upon the arrival of the Spanish invaders: Nahuatl/Aztec in central and southern Mexico, Quiché/Maya from Yucatan in southern Mexico to Honduras in central America and Quechua/Inca, from Ecuador to northern Chile. They each correspond to an empire into which previously many diverse, distinguishable peoples were assimilated. Since the Spanish invaders had destroyed most of their ‘heretical’ cultural objects by 1550, the question arises whether an accurate knowledge of their thought can be obtained. Some ethnohistorians believe that each of the aforementioned cultures developed a hieroglyphic system of codification and documentation, called Codices, to preserve their theocosmogony, history and wisdom. Since the sixteenth century, however, it is known with certainty that only the Aztec and Mayan cultures developed such a system. According to some historians, the Incan culture did not use any kind of writing. They probably created ‘paintings’, as the Spaniards called their hieroglyphs, but these were totally destroyed. It is known that all pre-Columbian religions worshipped the events and forces of nature. The term used to name them was translated into Spanish as ‘gods’ when they were acceptable, or ‘demons’ when they seemed heretical – the indigenous peoples were polytheistic. The gods did not dwell in a region beyond our world, but rather populated it and were actively intertwined with it. All pre-Columbian cultures believed the sun to be the highest deity. The universe was conceived as a holistic structure in which human life, society and the gods were parts of an interrelated universe. Beyond these, however, the three cultures believed in an intangible, abstract deity, or principle, which ruled above all others. The sun, being the highest tangible deity, led the priests of these cultures to observe the skies. Based on a highly developed knowledge of astronomy and mathematics, they established an accurate solar calendar.


2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darin Barney

Background: This article surveys recent engagement with infrastructure across several fields, with particular attention to analyses of the relationship between infrastructure, extractive capitalism, and settler colonialism.  Analysis: The article treats infrastructure as a form of non-discursive politics and examines the critical status of the concept in light of the historical and contemporary implications of infrastructure in colonialism, settler colonialism, and racial capitalism.  Conclusions and implications: The article concludes that treatments of infrastructure in recent critical feminist, queer, and Indigenous thought open new possibilities for rethinking politics, communication, and media. Contexte : Cet article examine l’engagement récent en matières d’infrastructures dans plusieurs domaines, et accorde une attention particulière aux analyses des relations entre les infrastructures, le capitalisme extractif et le colonialisme-habitant. Analyse : L’article traite l’infrastructure comme une forme de politique non-discursive et examine le statut critique du concept en relation avec des implications historique et contemporaines de l’infrastructure dans le colonialisme, le colonialisme-habitant et le capitalisme racial.  Conclusions et implications : L’article conclut que le traitement de l’infrastructure dans la pensée critique, féministe, queer et indigène récente ouvre de nouvelles possibilités pour repenser la politique, la communication et les médias.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (0) ◽  
pp. 159-186
Author(s):  
Dae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document