scholarly journals Translation, adaptation, validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the ‘blue flags’ questionnaire

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Anne Westerweel ◽  
Yvonne F. Heerkens ◽  
Wiebke Oswald ◽  
Charlotte Post Sennehed ◽  
Kjerstin Stigmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Dutch Version

Validity and Reliability of the Dutch Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12NL) in Patients With Disorders of the Hip

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 1026-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Stevens ◽  
Inge van den Akker-Scheek ◽  
Bas ten Have ◽  
Marco Adema ◽  
Hilde Giezen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Dutch Version ◽  
Outcome Tool

scholarly journals Dutch Translation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire | Nederlandstalige vertaling van de Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Walentynowicz ◽  
Elke Vlemincx ◽  
David Preece ◽  
Olivier Luminet
Keyword(s):  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
English Version ◽  
Dutch Version ◽  
Original English Version ◽  
Psychometric Study ◽  
Dutch Translation ◽  
Zijn Door ◽  
Back Translation

This Dutch translation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ) was translated from the original English version. An initial translation from English to Dutch was conducted and refined by the authorship team. These Dutch items were then back-translated into English by a NAATI approved translator. Minor refinements to some of the Dutch items were made by the authorship team on the basis of this back-translation, resulting in the final Dutch version of the PAQ presented in this document. Our team is currently conducting a psychometric study on this Dutch PAQ to examine its validity and reliability. Deze Nederlandstalige vertaling van de Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ) is vertaald vanuit de oorspronkelijke Engelse versie. Een eerste vertaling van het Engels naar het Nederlands werd uitgevoerd en verfijnd door het auteursteam. Deze Nederlandstalige items werden vervolgens terugvertaald naar het Engels door een door NAATI erkende vertaler. Op basis van deze hervertaling zijn door het auteursteam kleine verfijningen aangebracht in enkele Nederlandstalige items, wat heeft geleid tot de definitieve Nederlandstalige versie van de PAQ die in dit document wordt gepresenteerd. Ons team voert momenteel een psychometrische studie uit op deze Nederlandstalige PAQ om de validiteit en betrouwbaarheid te onderzoeken.

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS-NL) in patients with hip pathology

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e0186064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilde Giezen ◽  
Martin Stevens ◽  
Inge van den Akker-Scheek ◽  
Inge H. F. Reininga
Keyword(s):  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Dutch Version ◽  
Outcome Score

Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1348-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanneke Weel ◽  
Ruben Zwiers ◽  
Donija Azim ◽  
Inger N. Sierevelt ◽  
Daniel Haverkamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Dutch Version ◽  
Ability Measure

scholarly journals Measuring vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in children with cancer: validation of the Dutch pediatric–modified Total Neuropathy Score

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 2867-2873 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Schouten ◽  
M. E. van de Velde ◽  
G. J. L. Kaspers ◽  
L. B. Mokkink ◽  
I. M. van der Sluis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Measurement Error ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Pediatric Oncology ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Dutch Version ◽  
Smallest Detectable Change ◽  
And Gender

Abstract Purpose The aims were to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the pediatric-modified Total Neuropathy Score (ped-mTNS) for assessing vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) in Dutch pediatric oncology patients aged 5–18 years. Methods Construct validity (primary aim) of the ped-mTNS was determined by testing hypotheses about expected correlation between scores of the ped-mTNS (range: 0–32) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (range: 0–18) for patients and healthy controls and by comparing patients and controls regarding their total ped-mTNS scores and the proportion of children identified with VIPN. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and measurement error (secondary aims) were assessed in a subgroup of study participants. Results Among the 112 children (56 patients and 56 age- and gender-matched healthy controls) evaluated, correlation between CTCAE and ped-mTNS scores was as expected (moderate (r = 0.60)). Moreover, as expected, patients had significantly higher ped-mTNS scores and more frequent symptoms of VIPN compared with controls (both p < .001). Reliability as measured within the intra-rater group (n = 10) (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICCagreement) = 0.64, standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) = 2.92, and smallest detectable change (SDCagreement) = 8.1) and within the inter-rater subgroup (n = 10) (ICCagreement = 0.63, SEMagreement = 3.7, and SDCagreement = 10.26) indicates insufficient reliability. Conclusion The Dutch version of the ped-mTNS appears to have good construct validity for assessing VIPN in a Dutch pediatric oncology population, whereas reliability appears to be insufficient and measurement error high. To improve standardization of VIPN assessment in children, future research aimed at evaluating and further optimizing the psychometric characteristics of the ped-mTNS is needed.

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the displaced aggression questionnaire

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1288-1300
Author(s):  
Danique Smeijers ◽  
Thomas F Denson ◽  
Erik H Bulten ◽  
Inti A Brazil
Keyword(s):  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Displaced Aggression ◽  
Dutch Version ◽  
Aggression Questionnaire
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document