scholarly journals 2544: Patient recruitment and referral patterns in face transplantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 30-30
Author(s):  
Harriet Kiwanuka ◽  
Mario A. Aycart ◽  
Ericka Bueno ◽  
Muayyad Alhefzi ◽  
Nicco Krezdorn ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 224-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriet Kiwanuka ◽  
Mario A. Aycart ◽  
Ericka M. Bueno ◽  
Muayyad Alhefzi ◽  
Nicco Krezdorn ◽  
...  

Crisis ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Rodi ◽  
Lucas Godoy Garraza ◽  
Christine Walrath ◽  
Robert L. Stephens ◽  
D. Susanne Condron ◽  
...  

Background: In order to better understand the posttraining suicide prevention behavior of gatekeeper trainees, the present article examines the referral and service receipt patterns among gatekeeper-identified youths. Methods: Data for this study were drawn from 26 Garrett Lee Smith grantees funded between October 2005 and October 2009 who submitted data about the number, characteristics, and service access of identified youths. Results: The demographic characteristics of identified youths are not related to referral type or receipt. Furthermore, referral setting does not seem to be predictive of the type of referral. Demographic as well as other (nonrisk) characteristics of the youths are not key variables in determining identification or service receipt. Limitations: These data are not necessarily representative of all youths identified by gatekeepers represented in the dataset. The prevalence of risk among all members of the communities from which these data are drawn is unknown. Furthermore, these data likely disproportionately represent gatekeepers associated with systems that effectively track gatekeepers and youths. Conclusions: Gatekeepers appear to be identifying youth across settings, and those youths are being referred for services without regard for race and gender or the settings in which they are identified. Furthermore, youths that may be at highest risk may be more likely to receive those services.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lida Feyz ◽  
Yale Wang ◽  
Atul Pathak ◽  
Manish Saxena ◽  
Felix Mahfoud ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Great and costly efforts are required to recruit potential participants into clinical trials. Using social media may make the recruitment process more efficient. Merely 20% of clinical trials are completed on time, a finding mostly linked to challenges in patient recruitment [1]. Recruitment through social media is increasingly being recognized as a tool to efficiently identify eligible subjects at lower costs [2, 3]. One of the key reasons for its success is the strong adherence of users to specific social media platforms. Facebook for instance has over 2.38 billion active monthly users of which about 75% access the network on a daily basis [4]. As such, the platform and other like it offer great potential to quickly and affordably enroll patients into clinical trials and surveys [3, 5-7]. At present, little evidence is available on the efficacy of using social media to recruit patients into cardiovascular and hypertension trials [8]. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of social media as an approach to recruit hypertensive patients into the RADIANCE-HTN SOLO trial. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of social media as an approach to recruit hypertensive patients into the RADIANCE-HTN SOLO trial. METHODS The RADIANCE-HTN SOLO (NCT02649426) is a multicenter, randomised study that was designed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (RDN) to reduce ambulatory blood pressure at 2 months in patients with combined systolic–diastolic hypertension in the absence of medications. Between March 28, 2016, and Dec 28, 2017, 803 patients were screened for eligibility and 146 were randomised to undergo RDN (n=74) or a sham procedure (n=72) [9]. Key entry criteria included: age 18-75 years with essential hypertension using 0-2 antihypertensive drugs. Patients were recruited from 21 hospitals in the USA and 18 hospitals in Europe. The study was approved by local ethics committees or institutional review boards and was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent. All recruitment materials including social media campaigns was approved by local ethics committees of the involved sites. Recruitment strategies included social media (Facebook), conventional advertisements (ads) (magazine, brochure/poster, radio, newspaper), web search (the clinical website, craigslist and web-browsing), and physician referral. Both newspaper ads and posters contained brief information about study entry criteria. Newspapers were distributed at public transport places and posters were displayed in outpatient cardiology and hypertension clinics. Radio ads were run for 30 or 60 seconds providing a short summary of the study, entry criteria and contact information. Ads were run in major metropolitan areas on radio stations with large adult listener bases during popular days and times. Facebook ads were targeted towards subjects >45 years old within a certain distance from a recruitment site (range 20-50 miles). Criteria were modified over time in order to increase response rates [i.e. distance was increased or decreased, age was increased to >55 year]. Facebook ads referred to a dedicated study website translated into country specific languages. If interested, subjects could complete an anonymous online screening questionnaire which provided direct automatic feedback on study eligibility. Eligible subjects were asked to provide contact details (name and telephone number) to receive additional information, a process coordinated via a secure online portal (Galen Gateway Patient Recruitment Portal, Galen Patient Recruitment, Inc., Cumberland, RI). Study site were only able to contact potential candidates within their area. The study sponsor was not able to access any personal data. Trained local site personnel or contracted secondary screeners contacted candidates by phone to verify eligibility and answer potential questions. A subsequent outpatient clinic visit was scheduled during which the study was explained in greater detail and the informed consent form could be signed. Statistical analysis Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and counts. Continuous variables were described as mean  standard deviation (SD) when normally distributed, data was compared using an Independent-Samples or Paired-Samples T test to analyze the difference between recruitment methods. In case of non-normal distribution, median data was presented with the interquartile range [IQR]. All statistical tests are 2-tailed. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical analysis (version 24.0).   RESULTS Results Facebook ads were active during a 115-day recruitment period between August and November 2017. A total of 285 potential candidates were recruited by different recruitment strategies in this specific time period, of which 184 (65%) were consented through Facebook (Table 1). The average age of the subjects consented through Facebook was 59 ± 8 years and 51% were male (Table 2). Facebook reached 5.3 million people in 168 separate campaigns run in proximity to 19 sites in the US and 14 sites in Europe. The number of candidates per site was variable with a median of 23 [17 – 26] candidates per site that passed the questionnaire (Figure 1). A total of 27/184 subjects were eventually randomised. Total cost for the Facebook ads was $152,412; costing $907/campaign and $0.83/click. This resulted in a total cost of $828/consent. During the same recruitment period, 7-day radio spots were launched with a total cost of $2,870; resulting in 9 inquiries with eventually 5 potential candidates and 2 consents ($1,435/consent).   CONCLUSIONS Conclusion Targeted social media was a successful and efficient strategy to find potential candidates for a multicenter blood pressure clinical trial. Whether this approach can be replicated across other disease states or demographics remains to be studied.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Andrew Storer

Consensus groups believe that clinical research networks are a more effective method of conducting clinical research than stand-alone sites. For example, clinical research networks have increased patient recruitment, decreased financial overhead, and allowed for coordinated research efforts, resulting in decreased duplication within high-cost research infrastructure. To date, there is little evidence describing the benefits and effectiveness of clinical research networks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1813.1-1813
Author(s):  
B. Lamoreaux ◽  
M. Francis-Sedlak ◽  
R. Holt ◽  
J. Rosenbaum

Background:Autoimmune inflammatory conditions of the eye may be associated with rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. This is also observed with thyroid eye disease (TED). Loss of immune tolerance to the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor has thyroidal consequences and nearly 40% of patients with Graves’ disease also have clinically evident Graves’ orbitopathy or TED.1TED results from tissue inflammation that causes retro orbital fat expansion2and extraocular muscle enlargement2and stiffening.3Because the orbital cavity is bony and of limited volume, proptosis and, in severe cases, optic nerve compression, can result. In many patients, muscle changes also cause ocular motility issues and double-vision. Because TED can have a similar presentation to other inflammatory orbital diseases (e.g., granulomatosis with polyangiitis) and Graves’ disease patients frequently have other autoimmune conditions (10% of Graves’s patients also have rheumatoid arthritis),4rheumatologists are likely to care for, or even diagnose, patients with TED.Objectives:This analysis sought to understand rheumatologists’ knowledge, and degree of participation in the treatment, of TED including referral patterns from ophthalmologists and endocrinologists for infusion therapies.Methods:Rheumatologists practicing in the United States attended an educational session and agreed to complete a 12-item survey regarding TED awareness, referral patterns, and management.Results:Of the 47 rheumatologists surveyed, 45 (96%) were familiar with TED. Ten (21%) physicians reported managing patients with TED, but the majority of physicians (62%) reported that they co-managed other autoimmune diseases in patients who also had TED. Additionally, 98% and 64% of polled rheumatologists had received referrals from ophthalmologists and endocrinologists, respectively, for autoimmune disease management or infusion therapy. Ophthalmology referrals for intravenous (IV) medication administration were most frequently for biologics (82%), but some referrals were also made for corticosteroids (2%) or other medication (13%) infusions. Only 23% of rheumatologists had administered a biologic specifically for TED (rituximab: 17%, tocilizumab: 2%, other: 4%), but 89% expressed an interest in administering a TED-specific monoclonal antibody therapy, awaiting FDA approval.Conclusion:Nearly all surveyed rheumatologists were aware of the signs and symptoms of TED, although most did not actively manage or administer medication for TED. Given the high level of interest in infusing novel, TED-specific biologics, rheumatologists may become an integral part of TED patient management with the approval of a new biologic, teprotumumab, for thyroid eye disease.References:[1]Bartley GB, et al.Am J Ophthalmol1996;121:284-90.[2]Forbes G, et al.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1986;7:651-656.[3]Simonsz HJ, et al.Strabismus1994;2:197-218.[4]Cardenas Roldan J, et al.Arthritis2012 2012;864907.Disclosure of Interests:Brian LaMoreaux Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics, Megan Francis-Sedlak Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics, Robert Holt Shareholder of: Horizon Therapeutics, Employee of: Horizon Therapeutics, James Rosenbaum Consultant of: AbbVie, Corvus, Eyevensys, Gilead, Novartis, Janssen, Roche, UCB Pharma; royalties from UpToDate


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document