Improving Rates of Cervical Cancer Screening and Pap Smear Follow-Up for Low-Income Women with Limited Health Literacy

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy T. Lindau ◽  
C. Tomori ◽  
M. A. McCarville ◽  
C. L. Bennett
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunday Joseph Ayamolowo ◽  
Lydia Feyisayo Akinrinde ◽  
Monisola Omoyeni Oginni ◽  
Love Bukola Ayamolowo

The global incidence of cancer is rising, and low-income and lower-middle-income countries have the worst figures. However, knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and cervical cancer screening practices remains poor in these regions. This study assessed the concept of health literacy as a potential determinant of knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and screening practices among female undergraduates. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 385 female undergraduates at a university in southwest Nigeria. A validated questionnaire composed of subscales on nine components of health literacy, knowledge of cervical cancer prevention, and cervical cancer screening practices was used for data collection. The majority of the respondents obtained a high score on most of the components of health literacy and 66% had good knowledge of cervical cancer prevention. Only 11% demonstrated good practices of Pap smear testing. Of all the components of health literacy, “feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers” (OR = 0.075; 95% CI [0.036–0.115]; p = 0.015) and “understanding health information well enough to know what to do” (OR = 0.055; 95% CI [0.006–0.104]; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with knowledge of cervical cancer prevention. Out of the major challenges related to cervical cancer screening among undergraduates, the feeling of being at risk (OR = 4.71; p < 0.05) and uncomfortable experiences from past screening (OR = 0.12; p < 0.05) were significantly associated with going for cervical cancer screening. The study concluded that levels of health literacy influenced knowledge of cervical cancer prevention among female undergraduates, but it did not affect their engagement in cervical cancer screening practices.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 515-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Margolis ◽  
Nicole Lurie ◽  
Paul G. McGovern ◽  
Mary Tyrrell ◽  
Jonathan S. Slater

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1275-1281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi E. Jones ◽  
Karen Brudney ◽  
Dorothy J. Sawo ◽  
Rafael Lantigua ◽  
Carolyn L. Westhoff

1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 745-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
HERSCHEL W. LAWSON ◽  
NANCY C. LEE ◽  
SANDRA F. THAMES ◽  
ROSEMARIE HENSON ◽  
DANIEL S. MILLER

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Reques ◽  
Camille Rolland ◽  
Anne Lallemand ◽  
Najat Lahmidi ◽  
Ezequiel Aranda-Fernández ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to compare cervical cancer screening by pap smear (PS) versus preliminary HPV testing based on self-collected samples (SC-HPV). Methods Interventional study among underprivileged women from 25 to 65 years old in four French cities. The control group (CG) was referred for a PS. The experimental group (EG) conducted a SC-HPV test followed by a PS in case of positivity. Differences on screening completion and cytological abnormalities were analysed by logistic and Cox regression. Results 383 women were assigned to the EG and 304 to the CG. The screening completion proportion was 39.5% in the CG compared to 71.3% in the EG (HR = 2.48 (CI 95% [1.99–3.08]; p < 0.001). The proportion of cytological abnormalities was 2.0% in the CG and 2.3% in the EG (OR = 1.20 (CI 95% [0.42–3.40]; p = 0.7). The proportion of participants lost to follow-up was 60.5% in the CG and 63.2% in the EG HPV positive (p = 0.18). Conclusion Providing an SC-HPV-test increased the participation of underprivileged women in CCS. Nevertheless, the significant number of lost to follow-up in both groups can undermine the initial benefits of the strategy for HPV positive women. Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03118258.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document