Labor Relations under the Recovery Act. Ordway Tead , Henry C. Metcalf

1934 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-141
Author(s):  
C. L. Christenson
Keyword(s):  

1933 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1277
Author(s):  
Colston Warne ◽  
Ordway Tead ◽  
H. C. Metcalf ◽  
Lawrence Valenstein ◽  
E. B. Weiss
Keyword(s):  


1937 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 202
Author(s):  
J. Finkelman ◽  
L. L. Lorwin ◽  
A. Wubnig


1936 ◽  
Vol 46 (183) ◽  
pp. 527
Author(s):  
J. Henry Richardson ◽  
Lewis L. Lorwin ◽  
Arthur Wubnig






Author(s):  
Lesja Kosmii

Goal. The purpose of this work is to analyze the norms of the current labor legislation regarding the regulation of the relations between the employee and the employer in the introduction of any restrictions and anti-epidemic measures in the conditions of national quarantine and prevention in such conditions of violations of labor rights of employees. It is important that during the course of the COVID-19 coronary pandemic measures, they were not only effective but also violated human rights, including work. Method. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of available scientific and theoretical material, experience of foreign countries and formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. During the research the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, comparative, functional, system-structural, logical-normative. Results. During the research it was found that the Ukrainian legislature, including foreign experience, was able to respond promptly to the quarantine situation by adopting anti-crisis laws, which did not neglect labor legislation. This is understandable, because in connection with the announcement of quarantine in the whole territory of Ukraine, employers had to make personnel decisions, and the current legislative framework did not clearly regulate the issues that arose. Scientific novelty. The study found that the updating of labor legislation in the area of labor relations regulation during the national quarantine period allows the employer to use certain forms of labor organization, in which the basic labor rights and guarantees of employees can be preserved. Practical importance. The results of the study can be used in law-making and law enforcement activities, as well as by employers in regulating labor relations with employees during the quarantine period.



2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
Evelyne Ingrid Mitu ◽  
Mile Vasic

Abstract Despite the differences between Japanese and styles, both will have a huge impact on their national economies. In terms of cultural management styles will continue to present significant differences. Although nothing is certain, both Americans and Japanese must continue to adapt their management styles to maintain global competitiveness. In general, human resources, labor relations within organizations are mainly features that differentiate the Japanese management system of other countries, especially the US.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document