The Black Hole Masses and Host Galaxies of BL Lacertae Objects

2003 ◽  
Vol 583 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Barth ◽  
Luis C. Ho ◽  
Wallace L. W. Sargent
2003 ◽  
Vol 595 (2) ◽  
pp. 624-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Falomo ◽  
J. K. Kotilainen ◽  
N. Carangelo ◽  
A. Treves

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 909-915
Author(s):  
HONG-GUANG WANG ◽  
JUN-HUI FAN ◽  
YONG HUANG ◽  
JING PAN ◽  
JIANG-HE YANG

In this work, we revisited the relationship between the subclasses of blazars (X–ray selected BL Lacertae objects (XBLs), radio selected BL Lacertae objects (RBLs), and flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs)) based on a sample of blazars. We found that the FSRQs–RBLs–XBLs relationship is clear in their bolometric luminosity, emission line luminosity and the accretion ratio with V FSRQs > V RBLs > V XBLs , where V stands for the three parameters. However, there is no clear difference amongst their central black hole masses. The bolometric luminosity is closely correlated with the emission line luminosity and the accretion ratio.


2020 ◽  
Vol 634 ◽  
pp. A114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Turgay Caglar ◽  
Leonard Burtscher ◽  
Bernhard Brandl ◽  
Jarle Brinchmann ◽  
Richard I. Davies ◽  
...  

Context. The MBH–σ⋆ relation is considered a result of coevolution between the host galaxies and their supermassive black holes. For elliptical bulge hosting inactive galaxies, this relation is well established, but there is still discussion concerning whether active galaxies follow the same relation. Aims. In this paper, we estimate black hole masses for a sample of 19 local luminous active galactic nuclei (AGNs; LLAMA) to test their location on the MBH–σ⋆ relation. In addition, we test how robustly we can determine the stellar velocity dispersion in the presence of an AGN continuum and AGN emission lines, and as a function of signal-to-noise ratio. Methods. Supermassive black hole masses (MBH) were derived from the broad-line-based relations for Hα, Hβ, and Paβ emission line profiles for Type 1 AGNs. We compared the bulge stellar velocity dispersion (σ⋆) as determined from the Ca II triplet (CaT) with the dispersion measured from the near-infrared CO (2-0) absorption features for each AGN and find them to be consistent with each other. We applied an extinction correction to the observed broad-line fluxes and we corrected the stellar velocity dispersion by an average rotation contribution as determined from spatially resolved stellar kinematic maps. Results. The Hα-based black hole masses of our sample of AGNs were estimated in the range 6.34 ≤ log MBH ≤ 7.75 M⊙ and the σ⋆CaT estimates range between 73 ≤ σ⋆CaT ≤ 227 km s−1. From the so-constructed MBH − σ⋆ relation for our Type 1 AGNs, we estimate the black hole masses for the Type 2 AGNs and the inactive galaxies in our sample. Conclusions. We find that our sample of local luminous AGNs is consistent with the MBH–σ⋆ relation of lower luminosity AGNs and inactive galaxies, after correcting for dust extinction and the rotational contribution to the stellar velocity dispersion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 493 (1) ◽  
pp. 1498-1499
Author(s):  
Thomas Wevers ◽  
Nicholas C Stone ◽  
Sjoert van Velzen ◽  
Peter G Jonker ◽  
Tiara Hung ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (S267) ◽  
pp. 421-428
Author(s):  
Philip F. Hopkins

AbstractRecent observations of tight correlations between supermassive black hole masses and the properties of their host galaxies demonstrate that black holes and bulges are co-eval and have motivated theoretical models in which feedback from AGN activity regulates the black hole and host galaxy evolution. Combining simulations, analytic models, and recent observations, answers to a number of questions are starting to take shape: how do AGN get triggered? How long do they live? What are typical light curves and what sets them? Is feedback necessary and/or sufficient to regulate BH growth? What effects does that feedback have on the host galaxy? On the host halo? All of this also highlights questions that remain wide open: how does gas get from a few pc to the AGN? What are the actual microphysical mechanisms of feedback? What is the tradeoff between stellar and AGN feedback? And, if there are different “modes” of feedback, where/when are each important?


1998 ◽  
Vol 296 (4) ◽  
pp. 961-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C. Wright ◽  
I.M. McHardy ◽  
R.G. Abraham ◽  
C.S. Crawford

2000 ◽  
Vol 542 (2) ◽  
pp. 731-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Falomo ◽  
Riccardo Scarpa ◽  
Aldo Treves ◽  
C. Megan Urry

Author(s):  
K. Nilsson ◽  
L. Takalo ◽  
T. Pursimo ◽  
A. Sillanpää ◽  
J. Heidt

1999 ◽  
Vol 512 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Megan Urry ◽  
Renato Falomo ◽  
Riccardo Scarpa ◽  
Joseph E. Pesce ◽  
Aldo Treves ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (S267) ◽  
pp. 266-266
Author(s):  
Andreas Schulze ◽  
Lutz Wisotzki

The observed relations between the black hole mass and the properties of the spheroidal galaxy component imply a close connection between the growth of supermassive black holes and the evolution of their host galaxies. An effective approach to study black hole growth is to measure black hole masses and Eddington ratios of well-defined type 1 AGN samples and determine the underlying distribution functions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document