Dispersal and Species Diversity: A Meta‐Analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 167 (6) ◽  
pp. 913-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc William Cadotte
Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1089
Author(s):  
Lei Xie ◽  
Yuan Yang ◽  
Yao Li ◽  
Shuifei Chen ◽  
Yueyao Feng ◽  
...  

Species diversity (SD) and genetic diversity (GD) are the two basic levels of biodiversity. In general, according to the consensus view, the parallel effects of environmental heterogeneity, area, and connectivity on two levels, can drive a positive correlation between GD and SD. Conversely, a negative correlation or no correlation would be expected if these effects are not parallel. Our understanding of the relationships between SD and GD among different ecosystems, sampling methods, species, and under climate change remains incomplete. In the present study, we conducted a hierarchical meta-analysis based on 295 observations from 39 studies and found a positive correlation between genetic diversity and species diversity (95% confidence interval, 7.6–22.64%). However, significant relationships were not found in some ecosystems when we conducted species–genetic diversity correlation analysis based on a single ecosystem. Moreover, the magnitudes of the correlations generally decreased with the number of sampling units and the annual average the temperature of sampling units. Our results highlight the positive correlation between GD and SD, thereby indicating that protecting SD involves protecting GD in conservation practice. Furthermore, our results also suggest that global increases in temperature during the 21st century will have significant impacts on global biodiversity.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (22) ◽  
pp. 4994-5008 ◽  
Author(s):  
GREGORY M. BONITO ◽  
ANDRII P. GRYGANSKYI ◽  
JAMES M. TRAPPE ◽  
RYTAS VILGALYS

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e0200274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Ashworth ◽  
Heather D. Toler ◽  
Fred L. Allen ◽  
Robert M. Augé

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 152-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Van Kerrebroeck ◽  
Dominique Maes ◽  
Luc De Vuyst

Parasitology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 143 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Y. X. HUANG ◽  
F. VAN LANGEVELDE ◽  
A. ESTRADA-PEÑA ◽  
G. SUZÁN ◽  
W. F. DE BOER

SUMMARYThe dilution effect, that high host species diversity can reduce disease risk, has attracted much attention in the context of global biodiversity decline and increasing disease emergence. Recent studies have criticized the generality of the dilution effect and argued that it only occurs under certain circumstances. Nevertheless, evidence for the existence of a dilution effect was reported in about 80% of the studies that addressed the diversity–disease relationship, and a recent meta-analysis found that the dilution effect is widespread. We here review supporting and critical studies, point out the causes underlying the current disputes. The dilution is expected to be strong when the competent host species tend to remain when species diversity declines, characterized as a negative relationship between species’ reservoir competence and local extinction risk. We here conclude that most studies support a negative competence–extinction relationship. We then synthesize the current knowledge on how the diversity–disease relationship can be modified by particular species in community, by the scales of analyses, and by the disease risk measures. We also highlight the complex role of habitat fragmentation in the diversity–disease relationship from epidemiological, evolutionary and ecological perspectives, and construct a synthetic framework integrating these three perspectives. We suggest that future studies should test the diversity–disease relationship across different scales and consider the multiple effects of landscape fragmentation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document