Do IFQs in the US Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Impact Price and Size?

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Ardini ◽  
Min-Yang Lee
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 1062-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel B. Truesdell ◽  
Deborah R. Hart ◽  
Yong Chen

Abstract Conventional yield-per-recruit (Y/R) and spawning-stock biomass-per-recruit (SSB/R) models make no allowance for spatial heterogeneity in fishing mortality, natural mortality, or growth across the stock area, although variability in these processes can affect model results. For example, areas with higher growth and/or lower natural mortality rates should be fished at a lower rate to maximize Y/R; however, these areas may be especially attractive to fishers and are often fished harder. Here, Y/R and SSB/R models are developed that simultaneously account for spatial heterogeneity in growth and fishing effort. These models are applied to the US Atlantic sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) fishery. The spatial variability in growth uses depth-integrated models from the literature and variability in effort is based on, alternatively, uniform, observed, and relative-optimal spatial harvesting distributions. The observed effort patterns are derived from vessel monitoring system positions, and illustrate one application for these widely collected but underutilized spatial data. In this example, the distribution of observed fishing effort reduces Y/R compared with the relative-optimal, or the uniform effort distribution implicitly assumed by conventional Y/R analysis. SSB/R was in some cases considerably higher under the relative-optimal distribution of effort than when calculated using observed or uniform effort patterns. Such more realistic spatially integrated Y/R and SSB/R models can help to evaluate the impact of effort patterns on fishery yield and stock egg production. These models demonstrate that the spatial distribution of effort can be as important as the overall average fishing mortality when managing fisheries to optimize Y/R, SSB/R, and yield.



PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e0203536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennie E. Rheuban ◽  
Scott C. Doney ◽  
Sarah R. Cooley ◽  
Deborah R. Hart


2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 1904-1917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel B. Truesdell ◽  
Deborah R. Hart ◽  
Yong Chen

Most stock assessment models assume that the probability of capture for all individuals of the same size or age in the stock area is equal. However, this assumption is rarely, if ever, satisfied. We used spatially referenced simulations, based on the US Atlantic sea scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) fishery, to generate catch, survey index, fishing effort, and size structure data that we input into a (nonspatial) catch-at-size stock assessment model to estimate abundance and mortality rates. We show that spatial patterns in fishing mortality degrade model performance for sessile stocks. Fishing mortality tended to be overestimated and abundance underestimated because trends in fishing mortality were exaggerated and the model misestimated the numbers of larger individuals due to spatial fishing patterns. These results are particularly relevant to sedentary species such as scallops, but are applicable wherever strong spatial patterns exist in fishing mortality.



2016 ◽  
Vol 547 ◽  
pp. 137-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
ND Bethoney ◽  
S Asci ◽  
KDE Stokesbury
Keyword(s):  
The Us ◽  


2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-184
Author(s):  
Amy Garrigues

On September 15, 2003, the US. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that agreements between pharmaceutical and generic companies not to compete are not per se unlawful if these agreements do not expand the existing exclusionary right of a patent. The Valley DrugCo.v.Geneva Pharmaceuticals decision emphasizes that the nature of a patent gives the patent holder exclusive rights, and if an agreement merely confirms that exclusivity, then it is not per se unlawful. With this holding, the appeals court reversed the decision of the trial court, which held that agreements under which competitors are paid to stay out of the market are per se violations of the antitrust laws. An examination of the Valley Drugtrial and appeals court decisions sheds light on the two sides of an emerging legal debate concerning the validity of pay-not-to-compete agreements, and more broadly, on the appropriate balance between the seemingly competing interests of patent and antitrust laws.



2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie N. Baker
Keyword(s):  


Author(s):  
Eric M. Patashnik
Keyword(s):  


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis M. Hsu ◽  
Judy Hayman ◽  
Judith Koch ◽  
Debbie Mandell

Summary: In the United States' normative population for the WAIS-R, differences (Ds) between persons' verbal and performance IQs (VIQs and PIQs) tend to increase with an increase in full scale IQs (FSIQs). This suggests that norm-referenced interpretations of Ds should take FSIQs into account. Two new graphs are presented to facilitate this type of interpretation. One of these graphs estimates the mean of absolute values of D (called typical D) at each FSIQ level of the US normative population. The other graph estimates the absolute value of D that is exceeded only 5% of the time (called abnormal D) at each FSIQ level of this population. A graph for the identification of conventional “statistically significant Ds” (also called “reliable Ds”) is also presented. A reliable D is defined in the context of classical true score theory as an absolute D that is unlikely (p < .05) to be exceeded by a person whose true VIQ and PIQ are equal. As conventionally defined reliable Ds do not depend on the FSIQ. The graphs of typical and abnormal Ds are based on quadratic models of the relation of sizes of Ds to FSIQs. These models are generalizations of models described in Hsu (1996) . The new graphical method of identifying Abnormal Ds is compared to the conventional Payne-Jones method of identifying these Ds. Implications of the three juxtaposed graphs for the interpretation of VIQ-PIQ differences are discussed.



2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-431
Author(s):  
Aurelie M. C. Lange ◽  
Marc J. M. H. Delsing ◽  
Ron H. J. Scholte ◽  
Rachel E. A. van der Rijken

Abstract. The Therapist Adherence Measure (TAM-R) is a central assessment within the quality-assurance system of Multisystemic Therapy (MST). Studies into the validity and reliability of the TAM in the US have found varying numbers of latent factors. The current study aimed to reexamine its factor structure using two independent samples of families participating in MST in the Netherlands. The factor structure was explored using an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in Sample 1 ( N = 580). This resulted in a two-factor solution. The factors were labeled “therapist adherence” and “client–therapist alliance.” Four cross-loading items were dropped. Reliability of the resulting factors was good. This two-factor model showed good model fit in a subsequent Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Sample 2 ( N = 723). The current finding of an alliance component corroborates previous studies and fits with the focus of the MST treatment model on creating engagement.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document