The European Powers and the Near East, 1875–1908. By Mason Whiting Tyler, Ph.D., Associate Professor of History in the University of Minnesota. [University of Minnesota Studies in the Social Sciences, no. 17.] (Minneapolis: the University. 1925. Pp. viii, 234)

1926 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Near East ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
University Of Minnesota ◽  
The Social ◽  
The University

scholarly journals Systematic reviews and evidence synthesis: Resources beyond the health sciences

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Kocher ◽  
Amy Riegelman
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Health Sciences ◽  
University Of Minnesota ◽  
The Social ◽  
The University

Asystematic review is a type of review that “seeks to systematically search for, appraise and synthesis research evidence,”1 including results published in grey literature. For decades, systematic reviews have been widely used to synthesize evidence in the health sciences. More recently, other disciplines, such as agriculture and the social sciences, have seen a rise in systematic reviews and related research methodologies. In response to this development, both Cornell University2 and the University of Minnesota Libraries3 have launched systematic review services that explicitly cater to non-health-sciences researchers at their institutions. Because it is recommended that librarians play a part on systematic review teams,4 there is a need for resources and skill development in this area.

scholarly journals Assessing Undergraduate Student Learning in Political Science: Development and Implementation of the “PACKS” Survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (01) ◽  
pp. 204-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Sydnor ◽  
Nicole Pankiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Faculty Involvement ◽  
University Of Virginia ◽  
Assessment Data ◽  
The Social ◽  
Full Participation ◽  
Online Assessments ◽  
The University ◽  
Assessment Requirements

ABSTRACT This article describes the creation and implementation of a new online assessment program (“PACKS”) for the department of politics at the University of Virginia. It discusses the benefits of online assessments, including the ease of administration, minimal faculty involvement, ability to link assessment data to existing student data (e.g., GPA and courses completed), and ability to track student progress over time. The assessment can be easily adapted for use by other departments in the social sciences and by other colleges and universities. The authors discuss the drawbacks to this type of assessment, including the challenge of obtaining the highest number of respondents. They recommend using a strong incentive to ensure full participation, such as an advising hold that prevents students from registering until they complete the assessment. The authors contend that implementing survey-based assessment tools is an ideal way for departments to meet their accrediting institutions’ assessment requirements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document