scholarly journals Low-energy supersymmetry breaking from string flux compactifications: Benchmark scenarios

2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 (04) ◽  
pp. 040-040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C Allanach ◽  
Fernando Quevedo ◽  
Kerim Suruliz
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Ashmore ◽  
Sebastian Dumitru ◽  
Burt A. Ovrut

Abstract The strongly coupled heterotic M-theory vacuum for both the observable and hidden sectors of the B − L MSSM theory is reviewed, including a discussion of the “bundle” constraints that both the observable sector SU(4) vector bundle and the hidden sector bundle induced from a single line bundle must satisfy. Gaugino condensation is then introduced within this context, and the hidden sector bundles that exhibit gaugino condensation are presented. The condensation scale is computed, singling out one line bundle whose associated condensation scale is low enough to be compatible with the energy scales available at the LHC. The corresponding region of Kähler moduli space where all bundle constraints are satisfied is presented. The generic form of the moduli dependent F-terms due to a gaugino superpotential — which spontaneously break N = 1 supersymmetry in this sector — is presented and then given explicitly for the unique line bundle associated with the low condensation scale. The moduli-dependent coefficients for each of the gaugino and scalar field soft supersymmetry breaking terms are computed leading to a low-energy effective Lagrangian for the observable sector matter fields. We then show that at a large number of points in Kähler moduli space that satisfy all “bundle” constraints, these coefficients are initial conditions for the renormalization group equations which, at low energy, lead to completely realistic physics satisfying all phenomenological constraints. Finally, we show that a substantial number of these initial points also satisfy a final constraint arising from the quadratic Higgs-Higgs conjugate soft supersymmetry breaking term.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iñaki García Etxebarria ◽  
Miguel Montero ◽  
Kepa Sousa ◽  
Irene Valenzuela

Abstract A bubble of nothing is a spacetime instability where a compact dimension collapses. After nucleation, it expands at the speed of light, leaving “nothing” behind. We argue that the topological and dynamical mechanisms which could protect a compactification against decay to nothing seem to be absent in string compactifications once supersymmetry is broken. The topological obstruction lies in a bordism group and, surprisingly, it can disappear even for a SUSY-compatible spin structure. As a proof of principle, we construct an explicit bubble of nothing for a T3 with completely periodic (SUSY-compatible) spin structure in an Einstein dilaton Gauss-Bonnet theory, which arises in the low-energy limit of certain heterotic and type II flux compactifications. Without the topological protection, supersymmetric compactifications are purely stabilized by a Coleman-deLuccia mechanism, which relies on a certain local energy condition. This is violated in our example by the nonsupersymmetric GB term. In the presence of fluxes this energy condition gets modified and its violation might be related to the Weak Gravity Conjecture.We expect that our techniques can be used to construct a plethora of new bubbles of nothing in any setup where the low-energy bordism group vanishes, including type II compactifications on CY3, AdS flux compactifications on 5-manifolds, and M-theory on 7-manifolds. This lends further evidence to the conjecture that any non-supersymmetric vacuum of quantum gravity is ultimately unstable.


2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (08) ◽  
pp. 1159-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. L. SHAPIRO

The stable version of the anomaly-induced inflation does not need a fine tuning to induce sufficient expansion of the Universe. The non-stable version (Starobinsky model) provides the graceful exit to the FRW phase. Here, we indicate the possibility of the inflation which is stable at the beginning and unstable at the end. The effect is due to the soft supersymmetry breaking and the decoupling of the massive sparticles at low energy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anson Hook ◽  
Robert McGehee ◽  
Hitoshi Murayama

2018 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 02005
Author(s):  
I. Antoniadis

I describe the phenomenology of a model of supersymmetry breaking in the presence of a tiny (tuneable) positive cosmological constant. It utilises a single chiral multiplet with a gauged shift symmetry, that can be identified with the string dilaton (or an appropriate compactification modulus). The model is coupled to the MSSM, leading to calculable soft supersymmetry breaking masses and a distinct low energy phenomenology that allows to differentiate it from other models of supersymmetry breaking and mediation mechanisms. We also study the question if this model can lead to inflation by identifying the dilaton with the inflaton. We find that this is possible if the Kähler potential is modified by a term that has the form of NS5-brane instantons, leading to an appropriate inflationary plateau around the maximum of the scalar potential, depending on two extra parameters.


1996 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 3283-3288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Savas Dimopoulos ◽  
Scott Thomas ◽  
James D. Wells

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 4241-4257 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. ANANTHANARAYAN ◽  
P. N. PANDITA

We consider supersymmetric SO(10) grand unification where the unified gauge group can break to the Standard Model gauge group through different chains. The breaking of SO(10) necessarily involves the reduction of the rank, and consequent generation of nonuniversal supersymmetry breaking scalar mass terms. We derive squark and slepton mass relations, taking into account these nonuniversal contributions to the sfermion masses, which can help distinguish between the different chains through which the SO(10) gauge group breaks to the Standard Model gauge group. We then study some implications of these nonuniversal supersymmetry breaking scalar masses for the low energy phenomenology.


1997 ◽  
Vol 52 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Savas Dimopoulos ◽  
Michael Dine ◽  
Stuart Raby ◽  
Scott Thomas ◽  
James D. Wells

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document